| |
| |
| Acknowledgements | |
| |
| |
| List of abbreviations | |
| |
| |
| Table of legislation | |
| |
| |
| |
| States, firms and legitimacy of regulation: insoluble issues? | |
| |
| |
| The incoming tide of Internet co-regulation | |
| |
| |
| Methodological approach: WGIG and scoping Internet governance | |
| |
| |
| Methodology for 'really really responsive regulation' | |
| |
| |
| Case studies in brief | |
| |
| |
| Conclusion: soft law and the Internet | |
| |
| |
| |
| Internet co-regulation and constitutionalism | |
| |
| |
| Examining the origins of Internet co-regulation | |
| |
| |
| A typology of regulation | |
| |
| |
| Towards a typology of self- and co-regulation | |
| |
| |
| Judicial review and co-regulation | |
| |
| |
| Sticks not carrots: why Americans don't 'do' co-regulation | |
| |
| |
| Conclusion: co-regulation and constitutionalism | |
| |
| |
| |
| Self-organization and social networks | |
| |
| |
| Web2.0 and alternative content regulation | |
| |
| |
| SNS and regulatory approaches | |
| |
| |
| Digital copyright | |
| |
| |
| Conclusion: governance and self-organization as examples of social entrepreneurship | |
| |
| |
| |
| An empire entire of itself? Standards, domain names and government | |
| |
| |
| Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) | |
| |
| |
| World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) | |
| |
| |
| ICANN and addressing infrastructure | |
| |
| |
| National registrar Nominet | |
| |
| |
| Conclusion: 'pure' self-regulation and moving targets | |
| |
| |
| |
| Content regulation and the Internet | |
| |
| |
| Independent Committee for the Supervision of Standards of Telephone Information Services (ICSTIS) | |
| |
| |
| Independent Mobile Classification Board (IMCB) | |
| |
| |
| Co-regulation in practice: Association for Video On Demand (ATVOD) | |
| |
| |
| Nederlands Instituut voor de Classificatie van Audiovisuele Media (NICAM) | |
| |
| |
| Pan European Game Information (PEGI) | |
| |
| |
| Conclusion: towards pan-sectoral, pan-European self-rating? | |
| |
| |
| |
| Private ISP censorship | |
| |
| |
| Internet Watch Foundation (IWF) | |
| |
| |
| International Association of Internet Hotlines (INHOPE) | |
| |
| |
| Conclusion: is co-regulation emerging and is it durable? | |
| |
| |
| |
| Analyzing case studies | |
| |
| |
| Analysis across case studies | |
| |
| |
| Co-regulation failure in practice: Digital Economy Act 2010 | |
| |
| |
| ISP judicial review of DE Act | |
| |
| |
| Conclusion: better regulation and co-regulation | |
| |
| |
| |
| Internet co-regulation as part of the broader regulatory debate | |
| |
| |
| Polycentric or just eccentric? | |
| |
| |
| Changing regulatory agendas | |
| |
| |
| Option zero is no option | |
| |
| |
| Risk and regulation | |
| |
| |
| Human rights and communications | |
| |
| |
| Conclusion: co-regulation and constitutionalism | |
| |
| |
| Bibliography | |
| |
| |
| Index | |