Selling of Supreme Court Nominees
Edition: 1995 (Reprint)
List price: $26.95
30 day, 100% satisfaction guarantee
If an item you ordered from TextbookRush does not meet your expectations due to an error on our part, simply fill out a return request and then return it by mail within 30 days of ordering it for a full refund of item cost.
Learn more about our returns policy
Description: "A highly informative study of presidential appointments and senatorial confirmation -- or rejection -- of those nominees to the Supreme Court throughout our history... This book is clearly written, fast paced, and very well documented. It is recommended to all interested to the political gateway to the federal appellate judiciary." -- Appellate Practice Journal and Update "Stands out in its scholarly thoroughness and innovative theory... one of the best books currently available for understanding the contemporary politics of Supreme Court nominations." -- Law and Politics Book Review Politics has always been at the heart of the Supreme Court selection process. According to John Anthony Maltese, the first "Borking" of a nominee came in 1795 with the defeat of John Rutledge's nomination as chief justice. What is different about today's appointment process, he argues, is not its politicization but the range of players involved and the political techniques that they use. In The Selling of Supreme Court Nominees, Maltese traces the evolution of the contentious and controversial confirmation process awaiting today's nominees to the nation's highest court. In this paperback edition, he includes a discussion of the recent nomination of Stephen Breyer, addressing various reform proposals made by critics of the current process and crediting President Clinton's protracted selection process with restoring some decorum to the proceedings. "John Anthony Maltese sets out to explain how the confirmation process of Supreme Court nominees has arrived at its present point -- and he succeeds admirably by interweaving historical and contemporary materials. He demonstrates precisely when and how interest groups became involved in the process and when and how the White House became actively involved in, as he puts it, 'selling' the nominees. I know of no other work that more thoroughly mines the presidential papers and other archival materials, and effectively integrates contemporary scholarship." -- Sheldon Goldman, University of Massachusetts, Amherst "A model of concise and careful scholarship." -- Journal of Politics
Rush Rewards U
You have reached 400 XP and carrot coins. That is the daily max!
Limited time offer:
Get the first one free!
All the information you need in one place! Each Study Brief is a summary of one specific subject; facts, figures, and explanations to help you learn faster.
List price: $26.95
Copyright year: 1995
Publisher: Johns Hopkins University Press
Publication date: 4/7/1998
Size: 6.25" wide x 9.00" long x 0.50" tall
John Anthony Maltese is the Albert B. Saye professor and head of the department of political science at the University of Georgia. He holds a PhD from Johns Hopkins University. His books include The Selling of Supreme Court Nominees (1995) and Spin Control: The White House Office of Communications and the Management of Presidential News (1992). He is a Josiah Meigs Distinguished Teaching Professor and was named the Georgia Professor of the Year by the Carnegie Foundation and the Council for Advancement and Support of Education (CASE). Professor Maltese also writes extensively about classical music and won a Grammy Award in 1996 from the National Academy of Recording Arts and Sciences.
|Series Editor's Foreword|
|Preface and Acknowledgments|
|The President versus the Senate|
|In the Beginning|
|The Rise of Organized Interests|
|Interests versus Nominees: The Defeat of John J. Parker|
|Interests versus Nominees: The Defeat of Clement Haynsworth|
|Speaking Out: Interest Groups, Nominees, and Presidents|
|The Institutional Presidency: Strategic Resources and the Supreme Court Selection Process|
|The Clinton Appointments and Proposals for Reform|