| |
| |
| Prologue | |
| |
| |
| |
| Science and Technology | |
| |
| |
| |
| In the Tradition | |
| |
| |
| |
| The Underlying Thesis | |
| |
| |
| |
| Going Beyond Programming | |
| |
| |
| |
| An Engineering Discipline of Software | |
| |
| |
| |
| The Philosophy of Science | |
| |
| |
| |
| Why Study the Philosophy of Science? | |
| |
| |
| |
| Science in the Early Twentieth Century | |
| |
| |
| |
| Popper's Correction to Logical Positivism | |
| |
| |
| |
| Epistemological Refinements | |
| |
| |
| |
| Science in a Historical Context | |
| |
| |
| |
| Some Other Contributions | |
| |
| |
| |
| The Structure of Science | |
| |
| |
| |
| Discovery and Design | |
| |
| |
| |
| The Relationship Between Science and Technology | |
| |
| |
| |
| Comparing the Engineer and the Scientist | |
| |
| |
| |
| Technological Knowledge | |
| |
| |
| |
| Modeling Reality | |
| |
| |
| |
| Scientific and Technological Models | |
| |
| |
| |
| Science and Free Phenomena | |
| |
| |
| |
| A Short Coda | |
| |
| |
| |
| Ecological Design | |
| |
| |
| |
| A Foundation for Design | |
| |
| |
| |
| The Foundation, So Far | |
| |
| |
| |
| The Rejection of Technical Rationality | |
| |
| |
| |
| Heidegger's Being-in-the-World | |
| |
| |
| |
| An Ecological Study of Design | |
| |
| |
| |
| Problem Solving | |
| |
| |
| |
| The Chapter's Unifying Theme | |
| |
| |
| |
| Human Problem Solving | |
| |
| |
| |
| Human Problem Solving in the Real World | |
| |
| |
| |
| The Nature of Expertise | |
| |
| |
| |
| Scientific Expertise | |
| |
| |
| |
| Complex Problem Solving | |
| |
| |
| |
| Activity, Reflection, Context | |
| |
| |
| |
| A Check Point | |
| |
| |
| |
| Activity Theory | |
| |
| |
| |
| Reflection in Practice | |
| |
| |
| |
| Closing the Circle | |
| |
| |
| |
| Reason, Bias, and Error | |
| |
| |
| |
| The Design Process | |
| |
| |
| |
| Finally, an Examination of Design | |
| |
| |
| |
| Design Practice | |
| |
| |
| |
| Architectural and Industrial Design | |
| |
| |
| |
| Engineering and System Design | |
| |
| |
| |
| The Individual Designer | |
| |
| |
| |
| The Challenge | |
| |
| |
| |
| Participatory Design | |
| |
| |
| |
| Evolving Models of Design | |
| |
| |
| |
| Human Factors and the Interface | |
| |
| |
| |
| User-Centered Design | |
| |
| |
| |
| The Scandinavian Approach | |
| |
| |
| |
| A Model of Computer Technology Adaptation | |
| |
| |
| |
| A Closing Observation | |
| |
| |
| |
| Software Design | |
| |
| |
| |
| The Software Process | |
| |
| |
| |
| A Foundation for Software Design | |
| |
| |
| |
| Software Engineering, a Historical Overview | |
| |
| |
| |
| The Traditional Technological Perspective | |
| |
| |
| |
| The Essential Software Process | |
| |
| |
| |
| Looking to the Future | |
| |
| |
| |
| Exploiting Software's Unique Properties | |
| |
| |
| |
| Design Methods | |
| |
| |
| |
| Adaptive Design in Context | |
| |
| |
| |
| Methodological Dilemmas | |
| |
| |
| |
| A Taxonomy of Design Methods | |
| |
| |
| |
| A Brief Survey of Design Methods | |
| |
| |
| |
| The Design Method Taxonomy | |
| |
| |
| |
| Adaptive Design | |
| |
| |
| |
| A Personal Preface | |
| |
| |
| |
| Exploiting Software's Unique Capabilities | |
| |
| |
| |
| Introduction to TEDIUM | |
| |
| |
| |
| Application Database Representation | |
| |
| |
| |
| Representing Knowledge in TEDIUM | |
| |
| |
| |
| Family Knowledge | |
| |
| |
| |
| The TEDIUM Window into Design | |
| |
| |
| |
| Some Final Observations | |
| |
| |
| |
| A Case Study | |
| |
| |
| |
| Issues in Evaluation | |
| |
| |
| |
| The Oncology Clinical Information System | |
| |
| |
| |
| Characterizing the Project | |
| |
| |
| |
| Evaluating the Environment | |
| |
| |
| |
| The Representation as a Specification | |
| |
| |
| |
| The Representation as a Conceptual Model | |
| |
| |
| |
| Characterizing the Software Process | |
| |
| |
| |
| Characterizing the Product | |
| |
| |
| |
| What the Case Study Tells Us | |
| |
| |
| Epilogue | |
| |
| |
| References | |
| |
| |
| Index | |