| |
| |
Editors' preface | |
| |
| |
List of contributors to the book and project | |
| |
| |
List of abbreviations and exchange rates | |
| |
| |
| |
Introduction to research on Countryside Stewardship Policies | |
| |
| |
| |
Introduction | |
| |
| |
| |
The STEWPOL-project | |
| |
| |
| |
The European policy context | |
| |
| |
| |
European environmental policies | |
| |
| |
| |
Rural development policies | |
| |
| |
| |
Agri-environmental policies | |
| |
| |
| |
Product quality policies | |
| |
| |
| |
The national context in the partner countries | |
| |
| |
| |
Economic structure of agriculture in STEWPOL countries | |
| |
| |
| |
Impact of agriculture on the environment | |
| |
| |
| |
Land and soil degradation | |
| |
| |
| |
Water resources | |
| |
| |
| |
Impact on landscape and bio-diversity | |
| |
| |
| |
Institutional framework for agri-environmental policies | |
| |
| |
| |
Administrative structure | |
| |
| |
| |
Implementation of Regulation 2078/92 | |
| |
| |
| |
Outline of the book | |
| |
| |
| |
Conclusions | |
| |
| |
| |
The economic nature of stewardship: complementarity and trade-offs with food and fibre production | |
| |
| |
| |
The rationale of Countryside Stewardship Policies (CSPs) | |
| |
| |
| |
What is Countryside Stewardship? | |
| |
| |
| |
The Production Possibility Curve (PPC) between Food and Fibre (FandF), Environmental Recreational Goods and Services (ERGSs) and Environmental Recreational Bads and Dis-services (ERBDs) | |
| |
| |
| |
Boundaries and reference points between ERGSs and ERBDs | |
| |
| |
| |
Options and tools for implementing Countryside Stewardship Policies | |
| |
| |
| |
Mandatory regulations | |
| |
| |
| |
Financial-economic voluntary tools | |
| |
| |
| |
Market creation | |
| |
| |
| |
The survey of CSPs | |
| |
| |
| |
Methodology | |
| |
| |
| |
Objectives of CSPs | |
| |
| |
| |
Rationale and attributes of CSPs | |
| |
| |
| |
Administration | |
| |
| |
| |
Target areas, uptake and average remuneration | |
| |
| |
| |
Commodities and markets potentially affected by CSPs | |
| |
| |
| |
Farm practices affected by CSPs: trade-offs between FandF, ERGSs and ERBDs | |
| |
| |
| |
Conclusions | |
| |
| |
| |
Policy indicators and a typology of instruments | |
| |
| |
| |
Introduction | |
| |
| |
| |
Definition and selection of criteria | |
| |
| |
| |
General guidelines | |
| |
| |
| |
Overview of criteria | |
| |
| |
| |
Environmental effectiveness | |
| |
| |
| |
Economic efficiency | |
| |
| |
| |
Sustainability | |
| |
| |
| |
Political acceptability | |
| |
| |
| |
Analysis of criteria of special interest | |
| |
| |
| |
Establishing a typology of the CSPs | |
| |
| |
| |
Principles of the methodology | |
| |
| |
| |
Factor selection | |
| |
| |
| |
Graphic representation of the typology | |
| |
| |
| |
Definition of homogeneous groups of CSPs | |
| |
| |
| |
Representation of G1, G2 and G7 on the "output map" | |
| |
| |
| |
Representation of G3, G4 and G5 on the "input map" | |
| |
| |
| |
Representation of G6 on an "output-input" map | |
| |
| |
| |
Concluding comments | |
| |
| |
| |
The invisible costs of scheme implementation and administration | |
| |
| |
| |
Introduction | |
| |
| |
| |
Transactions costs and contracting in agri-environmental policy | |
| |
| |
| |
Empirical administration cost estimations for agri-environmental schemes | |
| |
| |
| |
Cost typologies and incidence | |
| |
| |
| |
Methodology | |
| |
| |
| |
Findings from the case studies | |
| |
| |
| |
Discussion | |
| |
| |
| |
General factors affecting administrative cost levels | |
| |
| |
| |
Where does the burden of transactional costs fall? | |
| |
| |
| |
What scope is there to reduce the administrative costs of agri-environmental schemes? | |
| |
| |
| |
Scheme value for money | |
| |
| |
| |
Conclusions | |
| |
| |
| |
Farmers' attitudes and uptake | |
| |
| |
| |
Introduction | |
| |
| |
| |
Theoretical issues | |
| |
| |
| |
Model for farm behaviour | |
| |
| |
| |
Attitude measurement | |
| |
| |
| |
Methodology and data collection | |
| |
| |
| |
Pre-test | |
| |
| |
| |
Questionnaire design | |
| |
| |
| |
Data collection | |
| |
| |
| |
Regression models | |
| |
| |
| |
Hypotheses | |
| |
| |
| |
Analysis of results | |
| |
| |
| |
Some general results | |
| |
| |
| |
Model explaining attitude | |
| |
| |
| |
Model explaining participation | |
| |
| |
| |
Summary and conclusions | |
| |
| |
| |
Modelling regional production and income effects | |
| |
| |
| |
Introduction | |
| |
| |
| |
The methodological approach | |
| |
| |
| |
Choosing the policies to be investigated | |
| |
| |
| |
Choosing the appropriate type of model | |
| |
| |
| |
Positive mathematical programming | |
| |
| |
| |
Case studies of 8 European regions | |
| |
| |
| |
Oberosterreich--detailed modelling results for a European region that is a leader in CSPs | |
| |
| |
| |
Geography and climate, agricultural production and CSPs | |
| |
| |
| |
The structure of the regional agricultural sector model of Oberosterreich | |
| |
| |
| |
Effects of CSP implemented in Oberosterreich | |
| |
| |
| |
Effects on farm income and profiles, dual values and budgets | |
| |
| |
| |
Cropping structure, structure of production methods and output effects | |
| |
| |
| |
The effects of CSPs in the other study regions | |
| |
| |
| |
CAP, Agenda 2000 and their relevance for CSPs | |
| |
| |
| |
Estimating aggregate output effects | |
| |
| |
| |
Introduction | |
| |
| |
| |
Classification of CSPs according to the instruments that are used | |
| |
| |
| |
The role of property rights and direct payments | |
| |
| |
| |
Methods to evaluate market effects | |
| |
| |
| |
Results on the output consequences of CSPs from a farm survey | |
| |
| |
| |
Quantiative output effects of countryside stewardship schemes | |
| |
| |
| |
The method of equilibrium displacement models | |
| |
| |
| |
The Austrian 'crop rotation scheme' | |
| |
| |
| |
Parameters of the equilibrium displacement model | |
| |
| |
| |
Quantitative results of the equilibrium displacement model | |
| |
| |
| |
Summary and conclusions | |
| |
| |
| |
Analysis of trade distortions | |
| |
| |
| |
Introduction | |
| |
| |
| |
The relationship between agri-environmental policies and trade: theoretical considerations | |
| |
| |
| |
General framework | |
| |
| |
| |
Trade effects of agri-environmental policies: theoretical considerations | |
| |
| |
| |
Evidence | |
| |
| |
| |
The agri-environmental aspects of the Uruguay Round Agreement | |
| |
| |
| |
Main elements and implications | |
| |
| |
| |
Methodology for measuring trade distortion | |
| |
| |
| |
Alternative approaches | |
| |
| |
| |
The Producer Support Estimate (PSE) | |
| |
| |
| |
The qualitative approach | |
| |
| |
| |
Results of the quantitative and qualitative analysis | |
| |
| |
| |
Quantitative analysis | |
| |
| |
| |
Qualitative analysis | |
| |
| |
| |
Comparative statistical analysis | |
| |
| |
| |
Cluster analysis | |
| |
| |
| |
Discussion and conclusions | |
| |
| |
| |
Conclusions and policy recommendations | |
| |
| |
| |
Introduction | |
| |
| |
| |
Main outcomes of the research | |
| |
| |
| |
Policies | |
| |
| |
| |
Farmers | |
| |
| |
| |
Market effects | |
| |
| |
| |
Discussion | |
| |
| |
| |
Are countryside stewardship policies an efficient way to achieve countryside management objectives? | |
| |
| |
| |
Improving the outcome of policies | |
| |
| |
| |
Targeting of policies | |
| |
| |
| |
Increasing uptake | |
| |
| |
| |
Policy administration and mechanisms | |
| |
| |
| |
The transaction costs of policies | |
| |
| |
| |
Market and trade effects | |
| |
| |
| |
Political acceptability | |
| |
| |
| |
Conclusions | |
| |
| |
Annexe: Overview of inventoried policies | |
| |
| |
Austria | |
| |
| |
Belgium | |
| |
| |
France | |
| |
| |
Germany | |
| |
| |
Greece | |
| |
| |
Italy | |
| |
| |
Sweden | |
| |
| |
United Kingdom | |
| |
| |
Index | |