Critique of Pure Reason

Name: Critique of Pure Reason
Price: 21.19 USD
Availability: InStock
ISBN: 9781403911957

ISBN-10: 1403911959

ISBN-13: 9781403911957

Edition: 2nd 2003 (Revised)

Authors: Immanuel Kant, Norman Kemp Smith, Howard Caygill, Immanuel Kant

List price: $24.95

30 day, 100% satisfaction guarantee!

Marketplace

2 new & used from $21.19

what's this?

Rush Rewards U
Members Receive:

You have reached 400 XP and carrot coins. That is the daily max!

Book details

List price: $24.95
Edition: 2nd
Copyright year: 2003
Publisher: Palgrave Macmillan
Publication date: 9/6/2003
Binding: Paperback
Pages: 728
Size: 5.50" wide x 8.25" long x 1.50" tall
Weight: 1.936
Language: English

The greatest of all modern philosophers was born in the Baltic seaport of Konigsberg, East Prussia, the son of a saddler and never left the vicinity of his remote birthplace. Through his family pastor, Immanuel Kant received the opportunity to study at the newly founded Collegium Fredericianum, proceeding to the University of Konigsberg, where he was introduced to Wolffian philosophy and modern natural science by the philosopher Martin Knutzen. From 1746 to 1755, he served as tutor in various households near Konigsberg. Between 1755 and 1770, Kant published treatises on a number of scientific and philosophical subjects, including one in which he originated the nebular hypothesis of the…

Howard Caygill is Professor Of Modern European Philosophy at Kingston University London, UK.



Introduction



Of the Difference between Pure and Empirical Knowledge



The Human Intellect, even in an unphilosophical state, is in possession of certain cognitions a priori



Philosophy stands in need of a Science which shall determine the possibility, principles, and extent of Human Knowledge a priori



Of the Difference between Analytical and Synthetical Judgments



In all Theoretical Sciences of Reason, Synthetical Judgments a priori are contained as Principles



The Universal Problem of Pure Reason



Idea and Division of a Particular Science, under the Name of a Critique of Pure Reason


Transcendental Doctrine of Elements



Transcendental AEsthetic


Introductory



Of Space


Metaphysical Exposition of this Conception


Transcendental Exposition of the Conception of Space


Conclusions from the foregoing Conceptions



Of Time


Metaphysical Exposition of this Conception


Transcendental Exposition of the Conception of Time


Conclusions from the above Conceptions


Elucidation


General Remarks on Transcendental AEsthetic



Transcendental Logic



Of Logic in general



Of Transcendental Logic



Of the Division of General Logic into Analytic and Dialectic



Of the Division of Transcendental Logic into Transcendental Analytic and Dialectic



Transcendental Analytic



Analytic of Conceptions



Of the Transcendental Clue to the Discovery of all Pure Conceptions of the Understanding



Of the Logical use of the Understanding in general



Of the Logical Function of the Understanding in Judgments



Of the Pure Conceptions of the Understanding, or Categories



Of the Deduction of the Pure Conceptions of the Understanding



Of the Principles of Transcendental Deduction in general


Transition to the Transcendental Deduction of the Categories



Of the Possibility of a Conjunction of the manifold representations given by Sense


Of the Originally Synthetical Unity of Apperception


The Principle of the Synthetical Unity of Apperception is the highest Principle of all exercise of the Understanding


What Objective Unity of Self-consciousness is


The Logical Form of all Judgments consists in the Objective Unity of Apperception of the Conceptions contained therein


All Sensuous Intuitions are subject to the Categories, as Conditions under which alone the manifold contents of them can be united in one Consciousness


Observation


In Cognition, its Application to Objects of Experience is the only legitimate use of the Category


Of the Application of the Categories to Objects of the Senses in general


Transcendental Deduction of the universally possible employment in experience of the Pure Conceptions of the Understanding


Result of this Deduction of the Conceptions of the Understanding


Short view of the above Deduction



Analytic of Principles


Of the Transcendental Faculty of Judgment in general



Of the Schematism of the Pure Conceptions of the Understanding



System of all Principles of the Pure Understanding



Of the Supreme Principle of all Analytical Judgments



Of the Supreme Principle of all Synthetical Judgments



Systematic Representations of all Synthetical Principles thereof



Axioms of Intuition



Anticipations of Perception



Analogies of Experience



First Analogy.--Principle of the Permanence of Substance



Second Analogy.--Principle of the Succession of Time



Third Analogy.--Principle of Coexistence



The Postulates of Empirical Thought


Refutation of Idealism


General Remark on the System of Principles



Of the Ground of the division of all objects into Phenomena and Noumena



Of the Equivocal Nature or Amphiboly of the Conceptions of Reflection from the Confusion of the Transcendental with the Empirical use of the Understanding


Remark on the Amphiboly of the Conceptions of Reflection



Transcendental Dialectic



Of Transcendental Illusory Appearance



Of Pure Reason as the Seat of Transcendental Illusory Appearance



Of Reason in General



Of the Logical Use of Reason



Of the Pure Use of Reason



Of the Conceptions of Pure Reason



Of Ideas in General



Of Transcendental Ideas



System of Transcendental Ideas



Of the Dialectical Procedure of Pure Reason



Of the Conceptions of Pure Reason


Refutation of the Argument of Mendelssohn for the Substantiality or Permanence of the Soul


Conclusion of the Solution of the Psychological Paralogism


General Remark on the Transition from Rational Psychology to Cosmology



The Antinomy of Pure Reason



System of Cosmological Ideas



Antithetic of Pure Reason


First Conflict of the Transcendental Ideas


Second Conflict of the Transcendental Ideas


Third Conflict of the Transcendental Ideas


Fourth Conflict of the Transcendental Ideas



Of the Interest of Reason in these Self-contradictions



Of the Necessity Imposed upon Pure Reason of presenting a Solution of its Transcendental Problems



Sceptical Exposition of the Cosmological Problems presented in the four Transcendental Ideas



Transcendental Idealism as the Key to the Solution of Pure Cosmological Dialectic



Critical Solution of the Cosmological Problems



Regulative Principle of Pure Reason in relation to the Cosmological Ideas



Of the Empirical Use of the Regulative Principle of Reason, with regard to the Cosmological Ideas



Solution of the Cosmological Idea of the Totality of the Composition of Phenomena in the Universe



Solution of the Cosmological Idea of the Totality of the Division of a Whole given in Intuition


Concluding Remark on the Solution of the Transcendental Mathematical Ideas--and Introductory to the Solution of the Dynamical Ideas



Solution of the Cosmological Idea of the Totality of the Deduction of Cosmical Events from their Causes


Possibility of Freedom in Harmony with the Universal Law of Natural Necessity


Exposition of the Cosmological Idea of Freedom in Harmony with the Universal Law of Natural Necessity



Solution of the Cosmological Idea of the Totality of the Dependence of Phenomenal Existences


Concluding Remarks on the Antinomy of Pure Reason



The Ideal of Pure Reason



Of the Ideal in General



Of the Transcendental Ideal



Of the Arguments Employed by Speculative Reason in Proof of the Existence of a Supreme Being



Of the Impossibility of an Ontological Proof of the Existence of God



Of the Impossibility of a Cosmological Proof of the Existence of God


Detection and Explanation of the Dialectical Illusion in all Transcendental Arguments for the Existence of a Necessary Being



Of the Impossibility of a Physico-Theological Proof



Critique of all Theology based upon Speculative Principles of Reason



Of the Regulative Employment of the Ideas of Pure Reason


Of the Ultimate End of the Natural Dialectic of Human Reason


Transcendental Doctrine of Method


Introduction



The Discipline of Pure Reason



The Discipline of Pure Reason in the Sphere of Dogmatism



The Discipline of Pure Reason in Polemics


Scepticism Not a Permanent State for Human Reason



The Discipline of Pure Reason in Hypothesis



The Discipline of Pure Reason in Relation to Proofs



The Canon of Pure Reason



Of the Ultimate End of the Pure Use of Reason



Of the Ideal of the Summum Bonum as a Determining Ground of the ultimate End of Pure Reason



Of Opinion, Knowledge, and Belief



The Architectonic of Pure Reason



The History of Pure Reason