| |
| |
| Abbreviations | |
| |
| |
| Introduction | |
| |
| |
| |
| Social Contracts and Three Unsolved Problems of Justice | |
| |
| |
| |
| The State of Nature | |
| |
| |
| |
| Three Unsolved Problems | |
| |
| |
| |
| Rawls and the Unsolved Problems | |
| |
| |
| |
| Free, Equal, and Independent | |
| |
| |
| |
| Grotius, Hobbes, Locke, Hume, Kant | |
| |
| |
| |
| Three Forms of Contemporary Contractarianism | |
| |
| |
| |
| The Capabilities Approach | |
| |
| |
| |
| Capabilities and Contractarianism | |
| |
| |
| |
| In Search of Global Justice | |
| |
| |
| |
| Disabilities and the Social Contract | |
| |
| |
| |
| Needs for Care, Problems of Justice | |
| |
| |
| |
| Prudential and Moral Versions of the Contract; Public and Private | |
| |
| |
| |
| Rawls's Kantian Contractarianism: Primary Goods, Kantian Personhood, Rough Equality' Mutual Advantage | |
| |
| |
| |
| Postponing the Question of Disability | |
| |
| |
| |
| Kantian Personhood and Mental Impairment | |
| |
| |
| |
| Care and Disability: Kittay and Sen | |
| |
| |
| |
| Reconstructing Contractarianism? | |
| |
| |
| |
| Capabilities and Disabilities | |
| |
| |
| |
| The Capabilities Approach: A Noncontractarian Account of Care | |
| |
| |
| |
| The Bases of Social Cooperation | |
| |
| |
| |
| Dignity: Aristotelian, not Kantian | |
| |
| |
| |
| The Priority of the Good, the Role of Agreement | |
| |
| |
| |
| Why Capabilities? | |
| |
| |
| |
| Care and the Capabilities List | |
| |
| |
| |
| Capability or Functioning? | |
| |
| |
| |
| The Charge of Intuitionism | |
| |
| |
| |
| The Capabilities Approach and Rawls's Principles of Justice | |
| |
| |
| |
| Types and Levels of Dignity: The Species Norm | |
| |
| |
| |
| Public Policy: The Question of Guardianship | |
| |
| |
| |
| Public Policy: Education and Inclusion | |
| |
| |
| |
| Public Policy: The Work of Care | |
| |
| |
| |
| Liberalism and Human Capabilities | |
| |
| |
| |
| Mutual Advantage and Global Inequality: The Transnational Social Contract | |
| |
| |
| |
| A World of Inequalities | |
| |
| |
| |
| A Theory of Justice: The Two-Stage Contract Introduced | |
| |
| |
| |
| The Law of Peoples: The Two-Stage Contract Reaffirmed and Modified | |
| |
| |
| |
| Justification and Implementation | |
| |
| |
| |
| Assessing the Two-Stage Contract | |
| |
| |
| |
| The Global Contract: Beitz and Pogge | |
| |
| |
| |
| Prospects for an International Contractrarianism | |
| |
| |
| |
| Capabilities across National Boundaries | |
| |
| |
| |
| Social Cooperation: The Priority of Entidements | |
| |
| |
| |
| Why Capabilities? | |
| |
| |
| |
| Capabilities and Rights | |
| |
| |
| |
| Equality and Adequacy | |
| |
| |
| |
| Pluralism and Toleration | |
| |
| |
| |
| An International "Overlapping Consensus"? | |
| |
| |
| |
| Globalizing the Capabilities Approach: The Role of Institutions | |
| |
| |
| |
| Globalizing the Capabilities Approach: What Institutions? | |
| |
| |
| |
| Ten Principles for the Global Structure | |
| |
| |
| |
| Beyond "Compassion and Humanity": Justice for Nonhuman Animals | |
| |
| |
| |
| "Beings Entitled to Dignified Existence" | |
| |
| |
| |
| Kantian Social Contract Views: Indirect Duties, Duties of Compassion | |
| |
| |
| |
| Utilitarianism and Animal Flourishing | |
| |
| |
| |
| Types of Dignity, Types of Flourishing: Extending the Capabilities Approach | |
| |
| |
| |
| Methodology: Theory and Imagination | |
| |
| |
| |
| Species and Individual | |
| |
| |
| |
| Evaluating Animal Capabilities: No Nature Worship | |
| |
| |
| |
| Positive and Negative, Capability and Functioning | |
| |
| |
| |
| Equality and Adequacy | |
| |
| |
| |
| Death and Harm | |
| |
| |
| |
| An Overlapping Consensus? | |
| |
| |
| |
| Toward Basic Political Principles: The Capabilities List | |
| |
| |
| |
| The Ineliminability of Conflict | |
| |
| |
| |
| Toward a Truly Global Justice | |
| |
| |
| |
| The Moral Sentiments and the Capabilities Approach | |
| |
| |
| Notes | |
| |
| |
| References | |
| |
| |
| Index | |