Skip to content

Simplicius on the Planets and Their Motions: In Defense of a Heresy

Best in textbook rentals since 2012!

ISBN-10: 9004227083

ISBN-13: 9789004227088

Edition: 2012

Authors: Alan C. Bowen

List price: $157.00
Blue ribbon 30 day, 100% satisfaction guarantee!
Out of stock
We're sorry. This item is currently unavailable.
what's this?
Rush Rewards U
Members Receive:
Carrot Coin icon
XP icon
You have reached 400 XP and carrot coins. That is the daily max!

Description:

The question for Simplicius was whether his school's acceptance of Ptolemy's planetary hypotheses entailed a rejection of Aristotle's argument that the heavens are made of a special matter that moves by nature in a circle about the centre of the cosmos, thus a repudiation of the thesis that the cosmos is uncreated & everlasting.
Customers also bought

Book details

List price: $157.00
Copyright year: 2012
Publisher: Brill Academic Pub
Binding: Cloth Text 
Size: 6.25" wide x 9.25" long x 1.00" tall
Weight: 1.496
Language: English

Preface
Acknowledgments
Conventions
List of Figures
The Argument
Introduction
Simplicius' Life and Writings
The Commentary on De caelo 2.10-12
The Place of 2.10-12 in the De caelo
Simplicius' Predicament
The Text and Translation
The Annotation
Planetary Retrogradation: A Review
The Heresy of Non-Homocentric Aetherial Motion
Aetherial Rotation
The Task Remaining
Simplicius on the Heavens
The Heretical Rejection of All Hypotheses
Simplicius, In phys. 2.2 193b22-35
Aristotle on Physical Theory and Mathematical Science
Physical Theory and Astronomy Recast
Simplicius and the Path Not Taken
The Need for Observation
The Empirical Limitations of Astronomy
A Question of Priority
Conclusion
Simplicius, the Apologist
Saving Aristotle
The Harmonized Aristotle
Aristotle, the Physical Theorist
Conclusion
Saving the De caeto
Saving the Late Platonists
Conclusion
Simplicius, the Historian
Simplicius and His Sources
Alexander of Aphrodisias
On Teleology
On the Isodromic Planets
On the Motion by Nature of Larger Spheres
On a Circular Argument
On an Ellipsis
On the First Problem of 2.12
On the Four Elements
On a Lexical Matter
Alexander and Porphyry
Conclusion
Eudemus of Rhodes
On Anaximander
Eudemus with Sosigenes
On Callippus
Conclusion
Claudius Ptolemy
Sosigenes
Coda
Conclusion
Translation
In de caelo 2.10. The proportionality of the planetary speeds
291a29-b10
470.29-471.11 Contextualization
471.12-14 Basic Astronomical Fact
471.14-28 This Fact Is Unexpected
471.29-472.4 Aristotle's Solution
472.4-7 Problem with This Solution
472.8-20 Alexander's Response
472.21-473.7 Problem of Natural Motion Remains
473.8-474.6 Another Solution
474.7-13 Alexander The Isodromic Planets
474.14-30 Criticism
474.30-33 Alexander: The Upper Planets
474-33-475.8 Criticism
475.9-23 Plato on Planetary Speeds
475-23-476.10 Aristotle Reinterpreted
476.10-27 Rejection of Yet Another Solution
476.28-477.2 Problem of Isodromic Planets Remains
In de caelo 2.11. The Sphericity of the Wandering Stars
291b11-17
477.5-14 Contextualization
477.14-23 First Argument for Sphericity
477.24-27 Question of Circularity
477.27-478.3 Alexander's Proposal
478.3-8 Criticism
478.8-14 Aristotle Reinterpreted
478.15-32 Further Explication of First Argument
291b17-23
479.3-10 Second Argument for Sphericity (Part 1)
479.10-23 The Meaning of 'dichotomos'
479.23-480.15 Lunar Phases and Sphericity
480.16-24 Second Argument for Sphericity (Part 2)
In de caelo 2.12. The Proportionality of the Planetary Motions
291b24-292a18
480.26-481.22 Restatement of the Lemma
481.22-30 Alexander's Comment
292a18-b10
482.3-485.2 The First Problem and Its Solution
292b10-25
485.5-487.20 Further Explication of the Solution
487.20-488.9 Simplicius' Reconstruction of the Solution
488.10-14 Planetary Hypotheses Rejected
488.14-24 Planetary Hypotheses: Genesis
488.25-489.4 Criticism of the First Problem
489.5-11 Plato and the True Account
489.12-30 Alexander: The Elements Lack Soul
292b25-30
489.33-490.16 Second Problem and First Response
292b30-293a4
490.19-491.11 Second Response (or the First Continued)
293a4-11
491-15-492.11 Second (or Third) Response
492.12-24 This Response Assumes the Preceding
492.25-493.11 A History of Planetary Hypotheses
493.11-494.23 The Solar Hypothesis
494.23-495.17 The Lunar Hypothesis
495.17-497.24 Hypotheses for the Five Planets
497.24-499.15 Unwinding Spheres Hypothesized
499.16-501.21 Theorems on Homocentric Motion
501.22-502.19 The Unwinding Spheres Explained
502.19-504.3 The Total Number of Spheres
504.4-15 A Lexical Coda
504.16-505.19 The Failure of Homocentric Hypotheses
505.19-506.8 The Early Theorists Excused
506.8-16 The School's Proper Choice
506.16-22 Ptolemy's Criticism
506.23-507.8 Simplicius Puzzled
507.9-508.16 Eccentric and Homocentric Hypotheses
508.17-509.12 The Epicyclic Hypothesis
509.13-510.35 Aristotle and the New Hypotheses
Figures
Comments
In de caelo 2.10
Comment 10.01. De caelo 291a29-34: A Question of Proportionality
Comment 10.02. De caelo 291a29: �� ������ / � �����
Comment 10.03. De caelo 291a30: ��������
Comment 10.04. De caelo 291b9-10: �� �����������
Comment 10.05. In de caelo 471.1: “�������߿��” and Its Cognates
Comment 10.06. In de caelo 471.9: ����߿���
Comment 10.07. In de caelo 471.11: �� ���� `ƿ�������
Comment 10.08. In de caelo 47L20: Larger Bodies Move Faster by Nature
Comment 10.09. In de caelo 472.5-7: The Two Planetary Motions Thus Far
Comment 10.10. In de caelo 472.13-14: ��������� … ߿���� �����
Comment 10.11 In de caelo 473.15: A Lacuna?
Comment 10.12. In de caelo 473.26-27: Planetary Bodies as Hypostases
Comment 10.13. In de caelo 474.26-28: Planetary Eccentricity
Comment 10.14. In de caelo 475.2-4: On Linear and Angular Speed
Comment 10.15. In de caelo 475.11-12: An Emendation
In de caelo 2.11
Comment 11.01. In de caelo 479.12: An Emendation
Comment 11.02. In de caelo 480.10-15: On Drum- or Lentil-Shaped Moons
Comment 11.03. In de caelo 480.17-19: The Shape of Eclipsing Bodies
Comment 11.04: In de caelo 480.19-21: On Flat or Convex Moons at Syzygy
Comment 11.05: In de caelo 480.21-23: Another Mistaken Argument
In de caelo 2.12
Comment 12.01. De caelo 291b35-292a1: On 'Fewer Motions Than Some'
Comment 12.02. De caelo 292a3-6: Aristotle's Occultation of Mars
Comment 12.03. In de caelo 481.12-15: Ancient Records of Occultations
Comment 12.04. In de caelo 481.22-24: The Encouragement Offered
Comment 12.05. De caelo 292a18-21: The Heavenly Bodies Ensouled?
Comment 12.06. In de caelo 485.10-12: Fewer Motions: Better or Worse?
Comment 12.07. In de caelo 487.20-488.2: Awareness of Retrogradation
Plato, Timaeus 40c3-d3
Plato, Respublica 617a4-b4
The Planetary Turnings
Epinomis 986a8-987d2
Epicurus, Epistula ad Pythoclem
Ptolemy, Alm. 12.1: Apollonius of Perga
Conclusion
Comment 12.08. In de caelo 488.20: Proclus on Sosigenes
Comment 12.09. In de caelo 488.21-24: On 'Saving the Phenomena'
Plutarch, De facie 923a
Archimedes, Arenarius 1.4-7
Seneca, Nat quaest. 7.2.3
Stobaeus, Ecl. 1.25.3k
Plutarch, Plat. quaest. 1006b-c
Geminus, Intro, ast. 1.19-22
Conclusion
Comment 12.10. In de caelo 488.27-30: An Alternative Reading
Comment 12.11. De caelo 292b29-30: The Living Sources of Celestial Motion
Comment 12.12. In de caelo 493.15-17: The Third Solar Motion
Comment 12.13. In de caelo 494.9-12: An Error in the Solar Hypothesis?
Comment 12.14. In de caelo 494.20-22: The Length of the Day
Comment 12.15. In de caelo 495.5-8: On Latitude (������)
Comment 12.16. In de caelo 495.10-13: The Third Lunar Motion
Comment 12.17. In de caelo 495.13-16: An Error in the Lunar Hypothesis?
Comment 12.18. In de caelo 495.23-29: Values for the Sidereal Periods
Comment 12.19. In de caelo 495-29: The Particle “���”
Comment 12.20. In de caelo 496.6-9: Values for the Synodic Periods
Comment 12.21. In de caelo 496.27-28: The Verb “���”
Comment 12.22. In de caelo 497-3: The Hippopede
Comment 12.23. In de caelo 497-24-504.3: The Unwinding Spheres
Comment 12.24. In de caelo 498.5-10: An Emendation
Comment 12.25. IR de caelo 502.10-11: Sosigenes: The Unwinding Spheres
Comment 12.26. In de caelo 504.24-25: Axistotherus
Comment 12.27. In de caelo 32.12-33.16: Simplicius versus Philoponus
Comment 12.28. In de caelo 504.28-29: The Size of Venus and Mars
Comment 12.29. In de caelo 504.29-30: Shadows Cast by Venus
Comment 12.30. In de caelo 504.30-32: The Size of the Moon
Comment 12.31. In de caelo 504.33: Moerbeke: The Digression
Comment 12.32. In de caelo 504.33-505.1: The Ancient Digit (��������)
Comment 12.33. In de caelo 505.11-17: An Invisible Variation in Size
Comment 12.34. In de caelo 505.21-23: Homocentric Hypotheses: A History
Comment 12.35. In de caelo 506.2: Who Cares about the Number of Spheres?
Comment 12.36. In de caelo 506.11-15: Callisthenes and Aristotle
Comment 12.37. In de caelo 506.16: Simplicius on Ptolemy
Comment 12.38. In de caelo 506.22: Herophilus and the Nervous System
Comment 12.39. In de caelo 507.12-14: Simplicius and the Pythagoreans
Bibliography
Index of Passages
Passages in I.G. Kidd 1988-1999, vol. 1
Index of Names
Index of Subjects