| |
| |
Abbreviations | |
| |
| |
Introduction | |
| |
| |
| |
Social Contracts and Three Unsolved Problems of Justice | |
| |
| |
| |
The State of Nature | |
| |
| |
| |
Three Unsolved Problems | |
| |
| |
| |
Rawls and the Unsolved Problems | |
| |
| |
| |
Free, Equal, and Independent | |
| |
| |
| |
Grotius, Hobbes, Locke, Hume, Kant | |
| |
| |
| |
Three Forms of Contemporary Contractarianism | |
| |
| |
| |
The Capabilities Approach | |
| |
| |
| |
Capabilities and Contractarianism | |
| |
| |
| |
In Search of Global Justice | |
| |
| |
| |
Disabilities and the Social Contract | |
| |
| |
| |
Needs for Care, Problems of Justice | |
| |
| |
| |
Prudential and Moral Versions of the Contract; Public and Private | |
| |
| |
| |
Rawls's Kantian Contractarianism: Primary Goods, Kantian Personhood, Rough Equality' Mutual Advantage | |
| |
| |
| |
Postponing the Question of Disability | |
| |
| |
| |
Kantian Personhood and Mental Impairment | |
| |
| |
| |
Care and Disability: Kittay and Sen | |
| |
| |
| |
Reconstructing Contractarianism? | |
| |
| |
| |
Capabilities and Disabilities | |
| |
| |
| |
The Capabilities Approach: A Noncontractarian Account of Care | |
| |
| |
| |
The Bases of Social Cooperation | |
| |
| |
| |
Dignity: Aristotelian, not Kantian | |
| |
| |
| |
The Priority of the Good, the Role of Agreement | |
| |
| |
| |
Why Capabilities? | |
| |
| |
| |
Care and the Capabilities List | |
| |
| |
| |
Capability or Functioning? | |
| |
| |
| |
The Charge of Intuitionism | |
| |
| |
| |
The Capabilities Approach and Rawls's Principles of Justice | |
| |
| |
| |
Types and Levels of Dignity: The Species Norm | |
| |
| |
| |
Public Policy: The Question of Guardianship | |
| |
| |
| |
Public Policy: Education and Inclusion | |
| |
| |
| |
Public Policy: The Work of Care | |
| |
| |
| |
Liberalism and Human Capabilities | |
| |
| |
| |
Mutual Advantage and Global Inequality: The Transnational Social Contract | |
| |
| |
| |
A World of Inequalities | |
| |
| |
| |
A Theory of Justice: The Two-Stage Contract Introduced | |
| |
| |
| |
The Law of Peoples: The Two-Stage Contract Reaffirmed and Modified | |
| |
| |
| |
Justification and Implementation | |
| |
| |
| |
Assessing the Two-Stage Contract | |
| |
| |
| |
The Global Contract: Beitz and Pogge | |
| |
| |
| |
Prospects for an International Contractrarianism | |
| |
| |
| |
Capabilities across National Boundaries | |
| |
| |
| |
Social Cooperation: The Priority of Entidements | |
| |
| |
| |
Why Capabilities? | |
| |
| |
| |
Capabilities and Rights | |
| |
| |
| |
Equality and Adequacy | |
| |
| |
| |
Pluralism and Toleration | |
| |
| |
| |
An International "Overlapping Consensus"? | |
| |
| |
| |
Globalizing the Capabilities Approach: The Role of Institutions | |
| |
| |
| |
Globalizing the Capabilities Approach: What Institutions? | |
| |
| |
| |
Ten Principles for the Global Structure | |
| |
| |
| |
Beyond "Compassion and Humanity": Justice for Nonhuman Animals | |
| |
| |
| |
"Beings Entitled to Dignified Existence" | |
| |
| |
| |
Kantian Social Contract Views: Indirect Duties, Duties of Compassion | |
| |
| |
| |
Utilitarianism and Animal Flourishing | |
| |
| |
| |
Types of Dignity, Types of Flourishing: Extending the Capabilities Approach | |
| |
| |
| |
Methodology: Theory and Imagination | |
| |
| |
| |
Species and Individual | |
| |
| |
| |
Evaluating Animal Capabilities: No Nature Worship | |
| |
| |
| |
Positive and Negative, Capability and Functioning | |
| |
| |
| |
Equality and Adequacy | |
| |
| |
| |
Death and Harm | |
| |
| |
| |
An Overlapping Consensus? | |
| |
| |
| |
Toward Basic Political Principles: The Capabilities List | |
| |
| |
| |
The Ineliminability of Conflict | |
| |
| |
| |
Toward a Truly Global Justice | |
| |
| |
| |
The Moral Sentiments and the Capabilities Approach | |
| |
| |
Notes | |
| |
| |
References | |
| |
| |
Index | |