| |
| |
Acknowledgments | |
| |
| |
List of Tables | |
| |
| |
Introduction | |
| |
| |
| |
Overview | |
| |
| |
| |
The Road to Come | |
| |
| |
| |
A Deeper Understanding of Justice as Fairness? | |
| |
| |
| |
Unity, Theodicy, and the Attractions of Liberalism | |
| |
| |
| |
A Final Word to the Reader | |
| |
| |
| |
The Public Basis View | |
| |
| |
| |
Initial Statement of the Public Basis View | |
| |
| |
| |
The Pivotal Argument | |
| |
| |
| |
Imputing the Pivotal Argument? | |
| |
| |
| |
The Public Basis View Restated | |
| |
| |
| |
Difficulties with the Strong Version | |
| |
| |
| |
Difficulties with the Weak Version | |
| |
| |
| |
Conclusion | |
| |
| |
| |
Stability and Congruence | |
| |
| |
| |
Stability, Inherent and Imposed | |
| |
| |
| |
Matching the Right and the Good in Justice as Fairness | |
| |
| |
| |
Congruence and Stability | |
| |
| |
| |
Congruence and Inherent Stability | |
| |
| |
| |
Ideals and Inconsistency | |
| |
| |
| |
An Inconsistency in Justice as Fairness? | |
| |
| |
| |
Ideals and Comprehensive Conceptions | |
| |
| |
| |
Endorsing on the Basis of Shared Ideals | |
| |
| |
| |
Congruence and C<sub>3</sub> | |
| |
| |
| |
C<sub>3</sub> and Inconsistency | |
| |
| |
| |
The Acquisition of Four Desires | |
| |
| |
| |
Two Readings of the Aristotelian Principle | |
| |
| |
| |
The Acquisition of Four Desires | |
| |
| |
| |
Four Desires and Thin Reasons | |
| |
| |
| |
Thin Reasons to Be Just | |
| |
| |
| |
Setting up the Problem | |
| |
| |
| |
The Aristotelian Principle and the Argument for Congruence | |
| |
| |
| |
Four Thin Reasons | |
| |
| |
| |
Some Questions about the First Three Arguments | |
| |
| |
| |
Some Puzzles about the Fourth Argument | |
| |
| |
| |
The Argument from Love and Justice | |
| |
| |
| |
Balances and Temptations | |
| |
| |
| |
Two Questions about Table II.3 | |
| |
| |
| |
Conditional Balances and Balance Conditionals | |
| |
| |
| |
The Argument from Love and Justice | |
| |
| |
| |
Love's Balance | |
| |
| |
| |
Four Comments on the Argument | |
| |
| |
| |
Kantian Congruence and the Unified Self | |
| |
| |
| |
An Overview of the Kantian Congruence Argument | |
| |
| |
| |
The Argument from C<sub>4</sub>a | |
| |
| |
| |
From the Ostensible Conclusion to Congruence | |
| |
| |
| |
Establishing (5.5') | |
| |
| |
| |
Defending (5.2) | |
| |
| |
| |
Finality, Rationality, and the Unity of the Self | |
| |
| |
| |
Kantian Unity | |
| |
| |
| |
Korsgaard, Unity and the Bridge Function | |
| |
| |
| |
Is the OP Necessary? | |
| |
| |
| |
Conclusion | |
| |
| |
| |
The Great Unraveling | |
| |
| |
| |
The Content of Ideals | |
| |
| |
| |
Defending C<sub>3</sub> | |
| |
| |
| |
Pluralism and the Failure of Congruence | |
| |
| |
| |
The Failure of Kantian Congruence | |
| |
| |
| |
The Great Unraveling | |
| |
| |
| |
Brief Contrasts with Other Accounts | |
| |
| |
| |
The Political Ideals of Justice as Fairness | |
| |
| |
| |
PL's Basic Argument for Stability | |
| |
| |
| |
C<sub>3</sub>'and the Sense of Justice | |
| |
| |
| |
C<sub>3</sub>' and the Ideals of Conduct | |
| |
| |
| |
C<sub>3</sub>' and the Social Ideals of Justice as Fairness | |
| |
| |
| |
Whither Congruence? | |
| |
| |
| |
Comprehensive Reasons to Be Just | |
| |
| |
| |
Moving from (9.2) and (9.3) to (9.5) | |
| |
| |
| |
Would there Be an Overlapping Consensus? | |
| |
| |
| |
Legitimacy and Justification | |
| |
| |
| |
Why Political Legitimacy? | |
| |
| |
| |
A Question about the Arguments for C<sub>9</sub> and C<sub>PL</sub> | |
| |
| |
| |
Public Reason, Mutual Assurance, and Pluralism about Justice | |
| |
| |
| |
Stability, Reflective Equilibrium, and Public Justification | |
| |
| |
| |
Conclusion | |
| |
| |
| |
Conclusion: Why Political Liberalism? | |
| |
| |
| |
The Moral Basis of Political Liberalism? | |
| |
| |
| |
A Conception-Based View | |
| |
| |
| |
Defending Political Liberalism | |
| |
| |
| |
"And very good it was" | |
| |
| |
Bibliography | |
| |
| |
Index | |