| |
| |
List of Tables | |
| |
| |
List of Figures | |
| |
| |
Acknowledgments | |
| |
| |
| |
Introduction | |
| |
| |
The Emergence of the Criminology of Place | |
| |
| |
The Tight Coupling of Crime at Place | |
| |
| |
Key Questions in the Criminology of Place | |
| |
| |
The Focus of Our Research: Seattle, Washington | |
| |
| |
The Street Segment as a Unit of Analysis | |
| |
| |
What Follows | |
| |
| |
| |
Putting Crime in Its Place | |
| |
| |
Putting Crime in Its Place | |
| |
| |
The Importance of Examining Crime at a Micro Geographic Level | |
| |
| |
Social Disorganization and Opportunity Theories: Recognizing the Importance of Theoretical Integration | |
| |
| |
Conclusions | |
| |
| |
| |
Crime Concentrations and Crime Patterns at Places | |
| |
| |
Is Crime Concentrated at Street Segments? | |
| |
| |
Developmental Patterns of Crime at Place | |
| |
| |
Conclusions | |
| |
| |
| |
The Importance of Street Segments in the Production of the Crime Problem | |
| |
| |
Mapping Trajectory Patterns | |
| |
| |
Statistical Clustering of Trajectory Patterns | |
| |
| |
The Heterogeneity of Street Segment Patterns | |
| |
| |
Are Street Segments of Specific Trajectory Patterns Attracted, Repulsed, or Independent? | |
| |
| |
Conclusions | |
| |
| |
| |
Concentrations of Crime Opportunities | |
| |
| |
Identifying Retrospective Longitudinal Data on Places | |
| |
| |
Motivated Offenders | |
| |
| |
Suitable Targets | |
| |
| |
Accessibility/Urban Form | |
| |
| |
Guardianship | |
| |
| |
Conclusions | |
| |
| |
| |
Are Processes of Social Disorganization Relevant to the Criminology of Place? | |
| |
| |
Structural Variables | |
| |
| |
Intermediating Variables | |
| |
| |
Conclusions | |
| |
| |
| |
Understanding Developmental Patterns of Crime at Street Segments | |
| |
| |
An Overall Model for Explaining Developmental Trajectories of Crime at Place | |
| |
| |
How Well Does Our Model Predict Variation in Crime Patterns at Street Segments? | |
| |
| |
Which Variables Are Most Important in Identifying Serious Crime Hot Spots? | |
| |
| |
Do Changes in Opportunity and Social Disorganization at Street Segments Impact upon Crime Waves and Crime Drops? | |
| |
| |
Conclusions | |
| |
| |
| |
Conclusions | |
| |
| |
The Law of Concentrations of Crime at Place | |
| |
| |
Stability and Variability of Crime at Place | |
| |
| |
The Importance of Studying Crime at Micro Units of Geography | |
| |
| |
Hot Spots of Opportunity and Social Disorganization | |
| |
| |
Hot Spots of Crime Are Predictable | |
| |
| |
Recognizing the Tight Coupling of Crime to Place: Policy Implications | |
| |
| |
Limitations | |
| |
| |
Conclusions | |
| |
| |
| |
Trajectory Analysis Model Selection and Diagnostic Statistics | |
| |
| |
| |
Ripley's K Function | |
| |
| |
| |
Cross-K Function | |
| |
| |
| |
Data Collection | |
| |
| |
Characteristics of Street Segments: Opportunity Perspectives | |
| |
| |
Characteristics of Street Segments: Social Disorganization | |
| |
| |
| |
Additional Statistical Models | |
| |
| |
Notes | |
| |
| |
References | |
| |
| |
Proper Name Index | |
| |
| |
Index | |