| |
| |
| Contributors | |
| |
| |
| Preface | |
| |
| |
| Introduction | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| New Realities of Fiscal Federalism | |
| |
| |
| |
| The Rise of Social Welfare and Onward March of Coercive Federalism | |
| |
| |
| |
| The Fiscal Crisis and Social Welfare Spending | |
| |
| |
| Enduring Coercive Federalism | |
| |
| |
| Cooperative Intergovernmental Sinews of Coercive Federalism | |
| |
| |
| Shades of Dual Federalism in State Activism | |
| |
| |
| Conclusion | |
| |
| |
| References | |
| |
| |
| |
| A Practitioner Responds | |
| |
| |
| Social Welfare Spending Dominates | |
| |
| |
| |
| The Great Recession and American Recovery and Reinvestment Act | |
| |
| |
| Health-Care Reform | |
| |
| |
| Conclusion | |
| |
| |
| Notes | |
| |
| |
| References | |
| |
| |
| |
| State-City and State-County Fiscal Relations: A Look at the Past and Present, and a Glimpse at the Future | |
| |
| |
| |
| Context for State-Local Relations | |
| |
| |
| Municipal and County Government Revenue Sources | |
| |
| |
| The State Mandate Issue | |
| |
| |
| State-Local Relations in 2020 | |
| |
| |
| Conclusion | |
| |
| |
| Notes | |
| |
| |
| References | |
| |
| |
| |
| A Practitioner Responds | |
| |
| |
| Making Crisis an Opportunity | |
| |
| |
| |
| The Great Recession | |
| |
| |
| Health-Care Reform | |
| |
| |
| The "New Normal" | |
| |
| |
| The State and Local Response | |
| |
| |
| References | |
| |
| |
| |
| From Interjurisdictional Cooperation to Collaboration | |
| |
| |
| |
| Administrative Strategies for a Networked World: Intergovernmental Relations in 2020 | |
| |
| |
| |
| Intergovernmental Relations Networks | |
| |
| |
| Administrative Strategies Needed in Intergovernmental Relations Networks | |
| |
| |
| An Education Gap? | |
| |
| |
| Conclusion | |
| |
| |
| References | |
| |
| |
| |
| A Practitioner Responds | |
| |
| |
| Information and Power in a Networked Administrative State | |
| |
| |
| |
| Central Themes and Relevancy | |
| |
| |
| Summary | |
| |
| |
| References | |
| |
| |
| |
| Refraining the Political and Legal Relationship between Local Governments and Regional Institutions | |
| |
| |
| |
| Theories of Local Government | |
| |
| |
| Metropolitan Government | |
| |
| |
| The European Union as a Model | |
| |
| |
| Lessons for Metropolitan and Regional Governance | |
| |
| |
| The Role of the States | |
| |
| |
| A New Era of Cooperation | |
| |
| |
| Notes | |
| |
| |
| References | |
| |
| |
| |
| A Practitioner Responds | |
| |
| |
| Home Rule and Regional Governance-Shall the "Twain" Ever Meet? | |
| |
| |
| |
| Comments and Observations | |
| |
| |
| Relevance to Regionalism | |
| |
| |
| A Word about Economic Development | |
| |
| |
| Conclusion | |
| |
| |
| References | |
| |
| |
| |
| The Challenges for the New Intergovernmental Manager | |
| |
| |
| |
| Agency Forms and Reforms: Institutional Design for State-Centric Networks and Block Grant Administration | |
| |
| |
| |
| Boundary-Spanning Management in Block Grant Administration | |
| |
| |
| A Case Study of State-Level Agency Reform: The Texas Capital Development Fund | |
| |
| |
| Discussion and Conclusion | |
| |
| |
| References | |
| |
| |
| |
| A Practitioner Responds | |
| |
| |
| The Promise of Reform and Local Agency Capacity | |
| |
| |
| |
| Key Themes and Arguments | |
| |
| |
| Conclusion | |
| |
| |
| Reference | |
| |
| |
| |
| Disaster Response 2020: A Look into the Future | |
| |
| |
| |
| Understanding the Background | |
| |
| |
| Cooperation versus Collaboration | |
| |
| |
| The National Response Framework and National Incident Management System: A Catalyst for Change? | |
| |
| |
| Disaster Response in 2020 | |
| |
| |
| Conclusion | |
| |
| |
| References | |
| |
| |
| |
| A Practitioner Responds | |
| |
| |
| The New Intergovernmental Role and the Necessity for Organizational Duality: References | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| Performance Measurement and Accountability in the Intergovernmental System in 2020 | |
| |
| |
| |
| Early Expectations | |
| |
| |
| Federal Performance Requirements | |
| |
| |
| Government Performance and Results Act: The Original and Driving Force of the Federal Performance Effort | |
| |
| |
| Program Assessment Rating Tool: The Bush Administration's Performance Effort | |
| |
| |
| Accountability in Intergovernmental Programs | |
| |
| |
| What about the Obama Approach? | |
| |
| |
| Looking into the Crystal Ball | |
| |
| |
| References | |
| |
| |
| |
| A Practitioner Responds | |
| |
| |
| The Promise and Realities of Performance Measurement and Accountability | |
| |
| |
| |
| Radin's Central Arguments | |
| |
| |
| Comments | |
| |
| |
| References | |
| |
| |
| |
| Managing Externalization: New Intergovernmental Roles for Public Managers | |
| |
| |
| |
| Four Waves of Intergovernmental Relations | |
| |
| |
| Seven Challenges of Management | |
| |
| |
| Summary: Actors and Roles in Network Intergovernmental Management | |
| |
| |
| Conclusion | |
| |
| |
| References | |
| |
| |
| |
| A Practitioner Responds | |
| |
| |
| Networks and Hierarchies Can Coexist | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| Responding to the Global Context | |
| |
| |
| |
| International Intergovernmental Relations and Impacts on American Federalism | |
| |
| |
| |
| Internationalizing Federalism | |
| |
| |
| Rationale for State and Local Government International Activism | |
| |
| |
| Arguments against State and Local International Activities | |
| |
| |
| Continuing Constitutional Ambiguity despite Supreme Court Decisions | |
| |
| |
| Suggestions for a Research Agenda | |
| |
| |
| References | |
| |
| |
| |
| The Challenges of Interdependence and Coordination in the Bilateral Agenda: Mexico and the United States | |
| |
| |
| |
| Interdependence, Complex Social Problems, and Federalism | |
| |
| |
| Interdependence within and between Federations: Mexico and the United States | |
| |
| |
| Addressing the Binational Issues: Arenas of Coordination | |
| |
| |
| Sectoral and Intersectoral Coordination | |
| |
| |
| Intergovernmental Coordination | |
| |
| |
| The Border | |
| |
| |
| Congressional Arena | |
| |
| |
| Conclusion | |
| |
| |
| References | |
| |
| |
| |
| A Practitioner Responds | |
| |
| |
| Hidden Tiger: The View from the State and Local Government Lair | |
| |
| |
| |
| The Ups and Downs of Intergovernmental Institutions | |
| |
| |
| Cross-Border Tensions and Legal Disputes | |
| |
| |
| Intergovernmental Perspectives with International Implications | |
| |
| |
| Could Performance Metrics Help Strengthen the Intergovernmental Partnership? | |
| |
| |
| References | |
| |
| |
| |
| The Evolution of Sustainable Cities as a Metropolitan Policy Challenge | |
| |
| |
| |
| Sustainable Cities as a Metropolitan Challenge | |
| |
| |
| The Intergovernmental Problem for Sustainable Development | |
| |
| |
| Examining the Challenge in the San Francisco Bay Area | |
| |
| |
| Intergovernmental Relations for Sustainable Communities | |
| |
| |
| Notes | |
| |
| |
| References | |
| |
| |
| |
| A Practitioner Responds | |
| |
| |
| Sustainability: A View from the Trenches | |
| |
| |
| |
| Vertical Intergovernmental Relations Challenges-Coordination and Capacity | |
| |
| |
| Horizontal Intergovernmental Relations-Shared Values, Correct Scale, and Collaborative Process | |
| |
| |
| Future Research | |
| |
| |
| References | |
| |
| |
| |
| Conclusion: The Future of Intergovernmental Relations in Networked Governance | |
| |
| |
| |
| Enduring Issues: Fiscal Tensions and Shared Sovereignty | |
| |
| |
| Increasing Horizontal Complexity for Networked Governance | |
| |
| |
| Intergovernmental Relations in a Global Context | |
| |
| |
| Final Thoughts | |
| |
| |
| References | |
| |
| |
| Index | |