Skip to content

Freedom of Expression in the Supreme Court The Defining Cases

Best in textbook rentals since 2012!

ISBN-10: 0847697118

ISBN-13: 9780847697113

Edition: 2000

Authors: Terry Eastland

List price: $63.00
Shipping box This item qualifies for FREE shipping.
Blue ribbon 30 day, 100% satisfaction guarantee!
what's this?
Rush Rewards U
Members Receive:
Carrot Coin icon
XP icon
You have reached 400 XP and carrot coins. That is the daily max!

Description:

In Freedom of Expression in the Supreme Court, Terry Eastland brings together the Court's leading First Amendment cases, some 60 in all, starting with Schenck v. United States (1919) and ending with Reno v. American Civil Liberties Union (1998). Complete with a comprehensive introduction, pertinent indices and a useful bibliography, Freedom of Expression in the Supreme Court offers the general and specialized reader alike a thorough treatment of the Court's understanding on the First Amendment's speech, press, assembly, and petition clauses.
Customers also bought

Book details

List price: $63.00
Copyright year: 2000
Publisher: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Incorporated
Publication date: 8/16/2000
Binding: Paperback
Pages: 432
Size: 6.84" wide x 10.00" long x 0.90" tall
Weight: 1.584
Language: English

Terry Eastland is Publisher, President, and CEO of The American Spectator & The American Spectator Online, a contributor to "The Rule of Law" column in the Wall Street Journal and author of Ending Affirmative Action: The Case for Colorblind Justice (Basic Books, 1996).

Preface
Acknowledgments and Credits
Introduction
Note to the Reader
Schenck v. United States, 1919
Opinion: Holmes
Response: Harvard Law Review
Abrams v. United States, 1919
Opinions: Clarke, Holmes
Response: The New Republic
Gitlow v. New York, 1925
Opinions: Sanford, Holmes
Responses: New York Times, Evening Star (Washington, D.C.), The New Republic
Whitney v. California, 1927
Opinions: Sanford, Brandeis
Stromberg v. California, 1931
Opinion: Hughes
Response: The Nation
Near v. Minnesota, 1931
Opinions: Hughes, Butler
Responses: Minneapolis Tribune, Washington Post, Los Angeles Times
Grosjean v. American Press Co., 1936
Opinion: Sutherland
DeJonge v. Oregon, 1937
Opinion: Hughes
Herndon v. Lowry, 1937
Opinions: Roberts, Van Devanter
Lovell v. City of Griffin, 1938
Opinion: Hughes
Thornhill v. Alabama, 1940
Opinion: Murphy
Responses: New York Times, The Christian Century
Cox v. New Hampshire, 1941
Opinion: Hughes
Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire, 1942
Opinion: Murphy
West Virginia State Board of Education v. Barnette, 1943
Opinions: Jackson, Frankfurter
Responses: The Christian Century, Evening Star (Washington, D.C.), New York Times, The New Republic
Thomas v. Collins, 1945
Opinions: Rutledge, Jackson, Roberts
United Public Workers v. Mitchell, 1947
Opinions: Reed, Black, Douglas
Kovacs v. Cooper, 1949
Opinions: Reed, Frankfurther, Jackson, Black, Rutledge
Terminiello v. Chicago, 1949
Opinions: Douglas, Jackson
American Communications Assn. v. Douds, 1950
Opinion: Vinson
Feiner v. New York, 1951
Opinions: Vinson, Black, Douglas
Kunz v. New York, 1951
Opinions: Vinson, Jackson
Dennis v. United States, 1951
Opinions: Vinson, Frankfurter, Jackson, Black, Douglas
Responses: New York Times, The Nation, Washington Post
Beauharnais v. Illinois, 1952
Opinions: Frankfurther, Black, Reed, Douglas, Jackson
Burstyn v. Wilson, 1952
Opinion: Clark
Roth v. United States, 1957
Opinions: Brennan, Douglas
Response: The Commonweal
NAACP v. Alabama ex rel. Patterson, 1958
Opinion: Harlan
Response: National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP)
Barenblatt v. United States, 1959
Opinions: Harlan, Black
Responses: Evening Star (Washington, D.C.), The New Republic
Edwards v. South Carolina, 1963
Opinion: Stewart
New York Times Co. v. Sullivan, 1964
Opinions: Brennan, Black
Responses: New York Times, The New Republic, Evening Star (Washington, D.C.)
Lamont v. Postmaster General, 1965
Opinions: Douglas, Brennan
United States v. Robel, 1967
Opinions: Warren, White
United States v. O'Brien, 1968
Opinion: Warren
Red Lion Broadcasting Co. v. Federal Communications Commission, 1969
Opinion: White
Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District, 1969
Opinions: Fortas, Black
Responses: Evening Star (Washington, D.C.), New York Times
Brandenburg v. Ohio, 1969
Opinions: Per Curiam, Douglas
Cohen v. California, 1971
Opinions: Harlan, Blackmun
New York Times Co. v. United States, 1971
Opinions: Per Curiam, Black, Brennan, Stewart, White, Burger, Harlan
Responses: New York Times, Evening Star (Washington, D.C.)
Branzburg v. Hayes, 1972
Opinions: White, Powell, Stewart
Response: New York Times
Miller v. California, 1973, and
Paris Adult Theatre I v. Slaton, 1973
Opinions: Miller, Burger, Douglas; Paris Adult Theatre, Burger, Brennan
Responses: Los Angeles Times, Washington Post, Boston Herald American, Wall Street Journal
Miami Herald Publishing Co. v. Tornillo, 1974
Opinions: Burger, White
Buckley v. Valeo, 1976
Opinions: Per Curiam, Burger, White
Responses: Washington Post, Wall Street Journal, New York Times
Virginia Pharmacy Board v. Virginia Consumer Council, 1976
Opinions: Blackmun, Stewart, Rehnquist
Response: Wall Street Journal
Zurcher v. Stanford Daily, 1978
Opinions: White, Stewart
Richmond Newspapers, Inc. v. Virginia, 1980
Opinions: Burger, Brennan, Rehnquist
New York v. Ferber, 1982
Opinion: White
Roberts v. United States Jaycees, 1984
Opinion: Brennan
Renton v. Playtime Theatres, Inc., 1986
Opinions: Rehnquist, Brennan
Bethel School Dist. No. 403 v. Fraser, 1986
Opinions: Burger, Brennan
Airport Commissioners v. Jews for Jesus, Inc., 1987
Opinion: O'Connor
Hustler Magazine v. Falwell, 1988
Opinion: Rehnquist
Hazelwood School District v. Kuhlmeier, 1988
Opinions: White, Brennan
Texas v. Johnson, 1989
Opinions: Brennan, Kennedy, Rehnquist
Responses: Atlanta Journal-Constitution, Indianapolis Star, George F. Will (syndicated column)
Milkovich v. Lorain Journal Co., 1990
Opinions: Rehnquist, Brennan
Rust v. Sullivan, 1991
Opinions: Rehnquist, Blackmun
Responses: America, The Progressive
R.A.V. v. St. Paul, 1992
Opinions: Scalia, White, Blackmun, Stevens
Responses: The Nation, The New Republic, Dallas Morning News
Hurley v. Irish-American Gay Group of Boston, 1995
Opinion: Souter
44 Liquormart, Inc. v. Rhode Island, 1996
Opinions: Stevens, Scalia, Thomas, O'Connor
Responses: New York Times, George F. Will (syndicated column)
Reno v. American Civil Liberties Union, 1997
Opinions: Stevens, O'Connor
Responses: Washington Post, Oregonian
National Endowment for the Arts v. Finley, 1998
Opinions: O'Connor, Scalia, Souter
Justices of the United States Supreme Court, 1919-1999
Bibliography
Index of Names and Topics
Index of Cases
About the Editor