| |
| |
| Preface | |
| |
| |
| Acknowledgments | |
| |
| |
| List of Abbreviations | |
| |
| |
| |
| The Issues and the Argument | |
| |
| |
| |
| Introduction | |
| |
| |
| |
| Late Development and State-Building | |
| |
| |
| The Two Dimensions of Industrial Policy | |
| |
| |
| Industrial Policy and State Capacity | |
| |
| |
| State Capacity as Dilemma | |
| |
| |
| Installing the Developmental State: Four Theses | |
| |
| |
| Locked in Place: The Reproduction of the State | |
| |
| |
| |
| Installing the State | |
| |
| |
| |
| The Origins of the Developmental State in Korea | |
| |
| |
| Introduction | |
| |
| |
| The Two Varieties of Statism | |
| |
| |
| The Continuity Thesis | |
| |
| |
| The Discontinuity Thesis | |
| |
| |
| A Critique of the Statist Discontinuity Thesis | |
| |
| |
| The Origins of the Developmental State | |
| |
| |
| A Look Ahead | |
| |
| |
| |
| Precursors to Planning in India: The Myth of the Developmental Bourgeoisie | |
| |
| |
| Introduction | |
| |
| |
| The Backdrop to the Bombay Plan | |
| |
| |
| The Bombay Plan | |
| |
| |
| The Capitalist Class and the Demise of the Bombay Plan | |
| |
| |
| The Roots of Business Opposition | |
| |
| |
| |
| The Demobilization of the Labor Movement | |
| |
| |
| Introduction | |
| |
| |
| Congress and the Popular Classes | |
| |
| |
| The Postwar Labor Upsurge | |
| |
| |
| A "Responsible" Labor Movement | |
| |
| |
| The Significance of Demobilization | |
| |
| |
| |
| The Business Offensive and the Retreat of the State | |
| |
| |
| Introduction | |
| |
| |
| The Commitment to Import-Substitution | |
| |
| |
| Jettisoning Nationalization | |
| |
| |
| Disciplinary Planning and the Business Offensive | |
| |
| |
| The Institutional Outcome (1): The Planning Commission | |
| |
| |
| The Institutional Outcome (2): The Filters on Discipline | |
| |
| |
| |
| Reproducing the State | |
| |
| |
| |
| State Structure and Industrial Policy | |
| |
| |
| Introduction | |
| |
| |
| State Structure and Industrial Policy in Korea | |
| |
| |
| State Structure and Industrial Policy in India | |
| |
| |
| The Rationality of Non-Disciplinary Industrial Policy | |
| |
| |
| |
| Locked in Place: Explaining the Non-Occurrence of Reform | |
| |
| |
| Introduction | |
| |
| |
| Existing Explanations for the Absence of Reform | |
| |
| |
| The Crisis of 1957 and the Search for Solutions | |
| |
| |
| The Attempt at Export Promotion | |
| |
| |
| Agenda-Setting and the Declining Legitimacy of the Planning Process | |
| |
| |
| The Reform Episode of the Mid-Sixties | |
| |
| |
| |
| Conclusion | |
| |
| |
| Bringing Capital "Back In" | |
| |
| |
| Capital and the Developmental State | |
| |
| |
| The Routes to and Obstacles against ELI | |
| |
| |
| Of Possibilities and Roads Not Taken | |
| |
| |
| Epilogue | |
| |
| |
| The Decline of Development Models | |
| |
| |
| Korea: The Revolt against the Developmental State | |
| |
| |
| India: The Gradual Implosion of ISI | |
| |
| |
| Notes | |
| |
| |
| Bibliography | |
| |
| |
| Index | |