Cultural Boundaries of Science Credibility on the Line
Spend $50 to get a
This item qualifies for FREE shipping.
30 day, 100% satisfaction guarantee!
Rush Rewards U
You have reached 400 XP and carrot coins. That is the daily max!
Why is science so credible? Usual answers center on scientists' objective methods or their powerful instruments. In his new book, Thomas Gieryn argues that a better explanation for the cultural authority of science lies downstream, when scientific claims leave laboratories and enter courtrooms, boardrooms, and living rooms. On such occasions, we use "maps" to decide who to believe--cultural maps demarcating "science" from pseudoscience, ideology, faith, or nonsense. Gieryn looks at episodes of boundary-work: Was phrenology good science? How about cold fusion? Is social science really scientific? Is organic farming? After centuries of disputes like these, Gieryn finds no stable criteria…
Copyright year: 1999
Publisher: University of Chicago Press
Publication date: 1/15/1999
Size: 6.00" wide x 9.25" long x 1.00" tall
|Introduction Contesting Credibility Cartographically|
|John Tyndall's Double Boundary-Work: Science, Religion, and Mechanics in Victorian England|
|The U.S. Congress Demarcates Natural Science and Social Science (Twice)|
|May the Best Science Win: Competition for the Chair of Logic and Metaphysics at the University of Edinburgh, 1836|
|The (Cold) Fusion of Science, Mass Media, and Politics|
|Hybridizing Credibilities: Albert and Gabrielle Howard Compost Organic Waste, Science, and the Rest of Society Epilogue Home to Roost "Science Wars" as Boundary-Work|
|Bibliography of Secondary Works|