| |
| |
| List of Figures | |
| |
| |
| List of Tables | |
| |
| |
| |
| Introduction to the Institutional Logics Perspective | |
| |
| |
| Introduction | |
| |
| |
| Institutional Logics as an Analytical Framework | |
| |
| |
| Aims of the Book | |
| |
| |
| Analytical Style of the Book | |
| |
| |
| Institutional Analysis as Interdisciplinary | |
| |
| |
| Pointing the Way to a New Approach | |
| |
| |
| Social Structure and Action | |
| |
| |
| Institutions as Material and Symbolic | |
| |
| |
| Institutions as Historically Contingent | |
| |
| |
| Institutions at Multiple Levels of Analysis | |
| |
| |
| Contents of the Book | |
| |
| |
| Precursors | |
| |
| |
| Macro-Societal Level | |
| |
| |
| Micro and Meso-Individual and Organization Levels | |
| |
| |
| Micro and Macro-Individual and Societal Levels | |
| |
| |
| Meso and Macro-Organization and Institutional Field Levels | |
| |
| |
| Meso and Macro-Institutional Field and Societal Levels | |
| |
| |
| Synthesis | |
| |
| |
| Conclusion | |
| |
| |
| |
| Precursors to the Institutional Logics Perspective | |
| |
| |
| Introduction | |
| |
| |
| Theories of Isomorphism | |
| |
| |
| Variant: Micro Level | |
| |
| |
| Elaboration: From Societal Culture to Field Structure | |
| |
| |
| Elaboration: Origin, Reproduction, Disappearance | |
| |
| |
| Variant: Logic of Instrumentalism, of Appropriateness | |
| |
| |
| Variant: From Structural to Cognitive and Cultural | |
| |
| |
| Variants: Logics of Action | |
| |
| |
| Integration: Three Pillars and Carriers of Institutions | |
| |
| |
| Institutional Pillars | |
| |
| |
| Institutional Carriers | |
| |
| |
| Proliferation: Institutional Logics | |
| |
| |
| Variant: A Focus on Normative Dimensions | |
| |
| |
| Discussion and Conclusion | |
| |
| |
| Appendix: Comparison of Propositions: | |
| |
| |
| J. W. Meyer and Rowan (1977) | |
| |
| |
| DIMaggio and Powell (1983) | |
| |
| |
| |
| Defining the Interinstitutional System | |
| |
| |
| Introduction | |
| |
| |
| Definitional Differences | |
| |
| |
| The Interinstitutional System as Ideal Type | |
| |
| |
| Institutional Orders: The X-Axis | |
| |
| |
| Institutional Orders: The Y-Axis | |
| |
| |
| Partial Autonomy: Cognitive and Organizational Loose Coupling | |
| |
| |
| Partial Autonomy: Near-Decomposability of Institutional Orders | |
| |
| |
| Definition of Institutional Fields | |
| |
| |
| Cultural Content: Cells of the X, Y Axes | |
| |
| |
| Cultural Space in Society | |
| |
| |
| Cultural Effects on Power and Agency | |
| |
| |
| Proliferation: Rearranging the Institutional Orders | |
| |
| |
| Variant: Community as an Institutional Order | |
| |
| |
| Discussion and Conclusion | |
| |
| |
| Appendix | |
| |
| |
| |
| Microfoundations of Institutional Logics | |
| |
| |
| A Model of Human Behavior: Situated, Embedded, Boundedly Intentional Behavior | |
| |
| |
| Modeling the Microfoundations | |
| |
| |
| Dynamic Constructivism | |
| |
| |
| An Integrative Model of the Microfoundations of Institutional Logics | |
| |
| |
| Social Identities, Goals, and Schemas | |
| |
| |
| Social Identities | |
| |
| |
| Goals | |
| |
| |
| Schemas | |
| |
| |
| Focus of Attention | |
| |
| |
| Top-Down Effects of Institutional Logics and Organizational Practices | |
| |
| |
| Bottom-Up Environmental Stimuli | |
| |
| |
| Availability, Accessibility, and Activation | |
| |
| |
| Automatic and Controlled Attentional Processes | |
| |
| |
| From Activation to Social Interaction | |
| |
| |
| From Social Interactions to Organizational Identities and Practices | |
| |
| |
| Decision Making | |
| |
| |
| Sensemaking | |
| |
| |
| Mobilization | |
| |
| |
| Implications of the Model of Microfoundations | |
| |
| |
| Conclusion | |
| |
| |
| |
| Stability and Change in the Interinstitutional System | |
| |
| |
| Introduction | |
| |
| |
| Evolutionary-Systems Level | |
| |
| |
| Historical Interdependence of Institutional Orders | |
| |
| |
| Individual-Societal-Level Effects on Institutional Change | |
| |
| |
| Cultural Entrepreneurship | |
| |
| |
| Case Narrative: Penney Segregates Family, Blends Religion and Corporation | |
| |
| |
| Case Narrative: Sperling Segregates the Professions and Blends the Market and Corporation | |
| |
| |
| Case Narrative: Ettinger Blends Family, State, Market, and Corporation | |
| |
| |
| Cross-Narrative Discussion | |
| |
| |
| Discussion | |
| |
| |
| Conclusion | |
| |
| |
| |
| Dynamics of Organizational Practices and Identities | |
| |
| |
| Introduction | |
| |
| |
| From Social Interaction to Practices and Organizational Identities | |
| |
| |
| The Dynamics of Practices and Identities in Organizations | |
| |
| |
| The Dynamics of Practices and Identities Across Organizations | |
| |
| |
| Conclusion | |
| |
| |
| |
| The Emergence and Evolution of Field-Level Logics | |
| |
| |
| Introduction | |
| |
| |
| A Model of Cultural Emergence | |
| |
| |
| Societal and External Logics | |
| |
| |
| Symbolic Representations: Theories, Frames, and Narratives | |
| |
| |
| Resource Environments and their Effects on Institutional Logics | |
| |
| |
| Vocabularies of Practice and the Emergence of Field-Level Logics | |
| |
| |
| Evolution and Change in Field-Level Logics | |
| |
| |
| Conclusion | |
| |
| |
| |
| Implications of the Institutional Logics Perspective | |
| |
| |
| Implications for Other Disciplines and Substantive Research Domains | |
| |
| |
| Historical and Comparative Analysis of Institutions | |
| |
| |
| Institutional Complexity | |
| |
| |
| Social Movements | |
| |
| |
| Cultural and Institutional Entrepreneurship | |
| |
| |
| Institutional Work | |
| |
| |
| Organizational Identity | |
| |
| |
| Organizational Design | |
| |
| |
| Strategy | |
| |
| |
| Microprocesses | |
| |
| |
| Methods of Analysis | |
| |
| |
| Conclusion | |
| |
| |
| References | |
| |
| |
| Index | |