| |
| |
List of figures | |
| |
| |
List of tables | |
| |
| |
Foreword | |
| |
| |
Preface | |
| |
| |
Acknowledgments | |
| |
| |
| |
The old psychology of leadership: Great men and the cult of personality | |
| |
| |
Leadership in history: The "great man" and his charisma | |
| |
| |
The political decline of the "great man" approach: The impact of the "great dictators" | |
| |
| |
The standardization of leadership: Personality models and their failings | |
| |
| |
The biographical approach: Looking for the roots of greatness in personal histories | |
| |
| |
The theoretical deficiency of individualistic models | |
| |
| |
The political deficiency of individualistic models | |
| |
| |
The faulty definition of leadership | |
| |
| |
Conclusion: Five criteria for a useful psychology of leadership | |
| |
| |
| |
The current psychology of leadership: Issues of context and contingency, transaction and transformation | |
| |
| |
The importance of context and contingency | |
| |
| |
The importance of followers | |
| |
| |
The importance of that "special something" | |
| |
| |
Conclusion: The need for a new psychology of leadership | |
| |
| |
| |
Foundations for the new psychology of leadership: Social identity and self-categorization | |
| |
| |
Social identity and group behavior | |
| |
| |
Social identity and collective power | |
| |
| |
Defining social identities | |
| |
| |
Conclusion: Setting the agenda for a new psychology of leadership | |
| |
| |
| |
Being one of us: Leaders as in-group prototypes | |
| |
| |
The importance of standing for the group | |
| |
| |
Prototypicality and leadership effectiveness | |
| |
| |
Prototypicality and leadership stereotypes | |
| |
| |
Prototypicality and the creativity of leaders | |
| |
| |
Conclusion; To lead us, leaders must represent "us" | |
| |
| |
| |
Doing it for us: Leaders as in-group champions | |
| |
| |
The importance of fairness | |
| |
| |
From fairness to group interest | |
| |
| |
Clarifying the group interest | |
| |
| |
Conclusion: To engage followers, leaders' actions and visions must promote group interests | |
| |
| |
| |
Crafting a sense of us: Leaders as entrepreneurs of identity | |
| |
| |
The complex relationship between reality, representativeness, and leadership | |
| |
| |
Social identities as world-making resources | |
| |
| |
Who can mobilise us? The importance of defining category prototypes | |
| |
| |
Who is mobilized? The importance of defining category boundaries | |
| |
| |
What is the nature of mobilization? The importance defining category content | |
| |
| |
Conclusion: Leaders are masters not slaves of identity | |
| |
| |
| |
Making us matter: Leaders as embedders of identity | |
| |
| |
Identity as a moderator of the relationship between authority and power | |
| |
| |
Leaders as artists of identity | |
| |
| |
Leaders as impresarios of identity | |
| |
| |
Leaders as engineers of identity | |
| |
| |
Conclusion: Leadership and the production of power both center on the hard but rewarding work of identity management | |
| |
| |
| |
Identity leadership at large: Prejudice, practice, and politics | |
| |
| |
The prejudice of leadership | |
| |
| |
The practice of leadership | |
| |
| |
The politics of leadership | |
| |
| |
Notes | |
| |
| |
References | |
| |
| |
Glossary | |
| |
| |
Index of leaders and leadership contexts | |
| |
| |
Author index | |
| |
| |
Subject index | |