| |
| |
| |
Introduction | |
| |
| |
| |
Transcription Networks: Basic Concepts | |
| |
| |
| |
Introduction | |
| |
| |
| |
The Cognitive Problem of the Cell | |
| |
| |
| |
Elements of Transcription Networks | |
| |
| |
| |
Separation of Timescales | |
| |
| |
| |
The Signs on the Edges: Activators and Repressors | |
| |
| |
| |
The Numbers on the Edges: The Input Function | |
| |
| |
| |
Logic Input Functions: A Simple Framework for Understanding Network Dynamics | |
| |
| |
| |
Multi-Dimensional Input Functions Govern Genes with Several Inputs | |
| |
| |
| |
Interim Summary | |
| |
| |
| |
Dynamics and Response Time of Simple Gene Regulation | |
| |
| |
| |
The Response Time of Stable Proteins Is One Cell Generation | |
| |
| |
Further Reading | |
| |
| |
Exercises | |
| |
| |
| |
Autoregulation: A Network Motif | |
| |
| |
| |
Introduction | |
| |
| |
| |
Patterns, Randomized Networks, and Network Motifs | |
| |
| |
| |
Detecting Network Motifs by Comparison to Randomized Networks | |
| |
| |
| |
Autoregulation: A Network Motif | |
| |
| |
| |
Negative Autoregulation Speeds the Response Time of Gene Circuits | |
| |
| |
| |
Negative Autoregulation Promotes Robustness to Fluctuations in Production Rate | |
| |
| |
| |
Positive Autoregulation Slows Responses and Can Lead to Bi-Stability | |
| |
| |
| |
Summary | |
| |
| |
Further Reading | |
| |
| |
Exercises | |
| |
| |
| |
The Feed-Forward Loop Network Motif | |
| |
| |
| |
Introduction | |
| |
| |
| |
The Number of Appearances of a Subgraph in Random Networks | |
| |
| |
| |
The Feed-Forward Loop Is a Network Motif | |
| |
| |
| |
The Structure of the Feed-Forward Loop Gene Circuit | |
| |
| |
| |
Dynamics of the Coherent Type-1 FFL with AND Logic | |
| |
| |
| |
The C1-FFL Is a Sign-Sensitive Delay Element | |
| |
| |
| |
Delay Following an ON Step of S[subscript x] | |
| |
| |
| |
No Delay Following an OFF Step of S[subscript x] | |
| |
| |
| |
The C1-FFL Is a Sign-Sensitive Delay Element | |
| |
| |
| |
Sign-Sensitive Delay Can Protect against Brief Input Fluctuations | |
| |
| |
| |
sign-Sensitive Delay in the Arabinose System of E. coli | |
| |
| |
| |
The OR Gate C1-FFL Is a Sign-Sensitive Delay for OFF Steps of S[subscript x] | |
| |
| |
| |
Interim Summary | |
| |
| |
| |
The Incoherent Type-1 FFL | |
| |
| |
| |
The Structure of the Incoherent FFL | |
| |
| |
| |
Dynamics of the I1-FFL: A Pulse Generator | |
| |
| |
| |
The I1-FFL Speeds the Response Time | |
| |
| |
| |
Response Acceleration Is Sign Sensitive | |
| |
| |
| |
Experimental Study of the Dynamics of an I1-FFL | |
| |
| |
| |
Three Ways to Speed Your Responses (An Interim Summary) | |
| |
| |
| |
Why Are Some FFL Types Rare? | |
| |
| |
| |
Steady-State Logic of the I1-FFL: S[subscript y] Can Turn on High Expression | |
| |
| |
| |
I4-FFL, a Rarely Selected Circuit, Has Reduced Functionality | |
| |
| |
| |
Convergent Evolution of FFLs | |
| |
| |
| |
Summary | |
| |
| |
Further Reading | |
| |
| |
Exercises | |
| |
| |
| |
Temporal Programs and the Global Structure of Transcription Networks | |
| |
| |
| |
Introduction | |
| |
| |
| |
The Single-Input Module (SIM) Network Motif | |
| |
| |
| |
SIMs Can Generate Temporal Expression Programs | |
| |
| |
| |
Topological Generalizations of Network Motifs | |
| |
| |
| |
The Multi-Output FFL Can Generate FIFO Temporal Order | |
| |
| |
| |
The Multi-Output FFL Can Also Act as a Persistence Detector for Each Output | |
| |
| |
| |
Signal Integration and Combinatorial Control: Bi-Fans and Dense Overlapping Regulons | |
| |
| |
| |
Network Motifs and the Global Structure of Sensory Transcription Networks | |
| |
| |
Further Reading | |
| |
| |
Exercises | |
| |
| |
| |
Network Motifs in Developmental, Signal Transduction, and Neuronal Networks | |
| |
| |
| |
Introduction | |
| |
| |
| |
Network Motifs in Developmental Transcription Networks | |
| |
| |
| |
Two-Node Positive Feedback Loops for Decision Making | |
| |
| |
| |
Regulating Feedback and Regulated Feedback | |
| |
| |
| |
Long Transcription Cascades and Developmental Timing | |
| |
| |
| |
Interlocked Feed-Forward Loops in the B. subtilis Sporulation Network | |
| |
| |
| |
Network Motifs inSignal Transduction Networks | |
| |
| |
| |
Information Processing Using Multi-Layer Perceptrons | |
| |
| |
| |
Toy Model for Protein Kinase Perceptrons | |
| |
| |
| |
Multi-Layer Perceptrons Can Perform Detailed Computations | |
| |
| |
| |
Composite Network Motifs: Negative Feedback and Oscillator Motifs | |
| |
| |
| |
Network Motifs in the Neuronal Network of C elegans | |
| |
| |
| |
The Multi-Input FFL in Neuronal Networks | |
| |
| |
| |
Multi-Layer Perceptrons in the C. elegans Neuronal Network | |
| |
| |
| |
Summary | |
| |
| |
Further Reading | |
| |
| |
Exercises | |
| |
| |
| |
Robustness of Protein Circuits: The Example of Bacterial Chemotaxis | |
| |
| |
| |
The Robustness Principle | |
| |
| |
| |
Bacterial Chemotaxis, or How Bacteria Think | |
| |
| |
| |
Chemotaxis Behavior | |
| |
| |
| |
Response and Exact Adaptation | |
| |
| |
| |
The Chemotaxis Protein Circuit of E. coli | |
| |
| |
| |
Attractants Lower the Activity of X | |
| |
| |
| |
Adaptation Is Due to Slow Modification of X That Increases Its Activity | |
| |
| |
| |
Two Models Can Explain Exact Adaptation: Robust and Fine-Tuned | |
| |
| |
| |
Fine-Tuned Model | |
| |
| |
| |
The Barkai-Leibler Robust Mechanism for Exact Adaptation | |
| |
| |
| |
Robust Adaptation and Inegral Feedback | |
| |
| |
| |
Experiments Show That Exact Adaptation Is Robust, Whereas Steady-State Activity and Adaptation Times Are Fine-Tuned | |
| |
| |
| |
Individuality and Robustness in Bacterial Chemotaxis | |
| |
| |
Further Reading | |
| |
| |
Exercises | |
| |
| |
| |
Robust Patterning in Development | |
| |
| |
| |
Introduction | |
| |
| |
| |
Exponential Morphogen Profiles Are Not Robust | |
| |
| |
| |
Increased Robustness by Self-Enhanced Morphogen Degradation | |
| |
| |
| |
Network Motifs That Provide Degradation Feedback for Robust Patterning | |
| |
| |
| |
The Robustness Principle Can Distinguish between Mechanisms of Fruit Fly Patterning | |
| |
| |
Further Reading | |
| |
| |
Exercises | |
| |
| |
| |
Kinetic Proofreading | |
| |
| |
| |
Introduction | |
| |
| |
| |
Kinetic Proofreading of the Genetic Code Can Reduce Error Rates of Molecular Recognition | |
| |
| |
| |
Equilibrium Binding Cannot Explain the Precision of Translation | |
| |
| |
| |
Kinetic Proofreading Can Dramatically Reduce the Error Rate | |
| |
| |
| |
Recognizing Self and Non-Self by the Immune System | |
| |
| |
| |
Equilibrium Binding Cannot Explain the Low Error Rate of Immune Recognition | |
| |
| |
| |
Kinetic Proofreading Increases Fidelity of T-Cell Recognition | |
| |
| |
| |
Kinetic Proofreading May Occur in Diverse Recognition Processes in the Cell | |
| |
| |
Further Reading | |
| |
| |
Exercises | |
| |
| |
| |
Optimal Gene Circuit Design | |
| |
| |
| |
Introduction | |
| |
| |
| |
Optimal Expression Level of a Protein under Constant Conditions | |
| |
| |
| |
The Benefit of the LacZ Protein | |
| |
| |
| |
The Cost of the LacZ Protein | |
| |
| |
| |
The Fitness Function and the Optimal Expression Level | |
| |
| |
| |
Laboratory Evolution Experiment Shows That Cells Reach Optimal LacZ Levels in a Few Hundred Generations | |
| |
| |
| |
To Regulate or Not to Regulate: Optimal Regulation in Variable Environments | |
| |
| |
| |
Environmental Selection of the Feed-Forward Loop Network Motif | |
| |
| |
| |
Summary | |
| |
| |
Further Reading | |
| |
| |
Exercises | |
| |
| |
| |
Demand Rules for Gene Regulation | |
| |
| |
| |
Introduction | |
| |
| |
| |
The Savageau Demand Rule | |
| |
| |
| |
Evidence for the Demand Rule in E. coli | |
| |
| |
| |
Mutational Explanation of the Demand Rule | |
| |
| |
| |
The Problem with Mutant-Selection Arguments | |
| |
| |
| |
Rules for Gene Regulation Based on Minimal Error Load | |
| |
| |
| |
The Selection Pressure for Optimal Regulation | |
| |
| |
| |
Demand Rules for Multi-Regulator Systems | |
| |
| |
| |
Summary | |
| |
| |
Further Reading | |
| |
| |
Exercises | |
| |
| |
| |
Epilogue: Simplicity in Biology | |
| |
| |
| |
The Input Function of a Gene: Michaelis-Menten and Hill Equations | |
| |
| |
| |
Binding of a Repressor to a Promoter | |
| |
| |
| |
Binding of a Repressor Protein to an Inducer: Michaelis-Menten Equation | |
| |
| |
| |
Cooperativity of Inducer Binding and the Hill Equation | |
| |
| |
| |
The Monod, Changeux, and Wymann Model | |
| |
| |
| |
The Input Function of a Gene Regulated by a Repressor | |
| |
| |
| |
Binding of an Activator to Its DNA Site | |
| |
| |
| |
Comparison of Dynamics with Logic and Hill Input Functions | |
| |
| |
| |
Michaelis-Menten Enzyme Kinetics | |
| |
| |
Further Reading | |
| |
| |
Exercises | |
| |
| |
| |
Multi-Dimensional Input Functions | |
| |
| |
| |
Input Function That Integrates an Activator and a Repressor | |
| |
| |
Exercises | |
| |
| |
| |
Graph Properties of Transcription Networks | |
| |
| |
| |
Transcription Networks Are Sparse | |
| |
| |
| |
Transcription Networks Have Long-Tailed Output Degree Sequences and Compact Input Degree Sequences | |
| |
| |
| |
Clustering Coefficients of Transcription Networks | |
| |
| |
| |
Quantitative Measures of Network Modularity | |
| |
| |
| |
Cell-Cell Variability in Gene Expression | |
| |
| |
Further Reading | |
| |
| |
Glossary | |
| |
| |
Bibliography | |
| |
| |
Index | |