Critical Reasoning

ISBN-10: 0495808784
ISBN-13: 9780495808787
Edition: 7th 2012
List price: $177.95 Buy it from $131.92
This item qualifies for FREE shipping

*A minimum purchase of $35 is required. Shipping is provided via FedEx SmartPost® and FedEx Express Saver®. Average delivery time is 1 – 5 business days, but is not guaranteed in that timeframe. Also allow 1 - 2 days for processing. Free shipping is eligible only in the continental United States and excludes Hawaii, Alaska and Puerto Rico. FedEx service marks used by permission."Marketplace" orders are not eligible for free or discounted shipping.

30 day, 100% satisfaction guarantee

If an item you ordered from TextbookRush does not meet your expectations due to an error on our part, simply fill out a return request and then return it by mail within 30 days of ordering it for a full refund of item cost.

Learn more about our returns policy

New Starting from $195.75
what's this?
Rush Rewards U
Members Receive:
coins
coins
You have reached 400 XP and carrot coins. That is the daily max!
You could win $10,000

Get an entry for every item you buy, rent, or sell.

Study Briefs

Limited time offer: Get the first one free! (?)

All the information you need in one place! Each Study Brief is a summary of one specific subject; facts, figures, and explanations to help you learn faster.

Add to cart
Study Briefs
Psychology Online content $4.95 $1.99
Add to cart
Study Briefs
Lifespan Human Development Online content $4.95 $1.99
Add to cart
Study Briefs
Sociology Online content $4.95 $1.99

Customers also bought

Loading
Loading
Loading
Loading
Loading
Loading
Loading
Loading
Loading
Loading

Book details

List price: $177.95
Edition: 7th
Copyright year: 2012
Publisher: Wadsworth
Publication date: 1/1/2011
Binding: Paperback
Pages: 432
Size: 7.40" wide x 9.13" long x 0.63" tall
Weight: 1.716

Dr. Jerry Cederblom serves in The University of Nebraska-Omaha Philosophy Department, teaching courses in moral and political philosophy, epistemology, history of philosophy, critical reasoning, and logic. He received his B.A. in philosophy from Whitman College and his Ph.D. in philosophy from the Claremont Graduate School. He is co-author of two books�CRITICAL REASONING and ETHICS AT WORK (both published by Wadsworth)--and co-editor (with William Blizek) of a third book: JUSTICE AND PUNISHMENT.

Preface
Deciding What to Believe
Critical Reasoning Versus Passive Reading or Listening
Critical Reasoning Versus Mere Disagreement
Critical Reasoning as a Cooperative Enterprise
Some Common Misconceptions About Critical Reasoning
Benefits of Critical Reasoning
The Main Techniques of Critical Reasoning
The Anatomy of Arguments: Identifying Premises and Conclusions
The Key to Identification: Seeing What Is Supported by What
Clues to Identifying Argument Part s: Indicator Words
Marking the Part s of Arguments
What to Do When There Are No Indicator Words
The Principle of Charitable Interpretation
Patterns of Argument
Identifying Premises and Conclusions in Longer Passages
Understanding Arguments Through Reconstruction
Understanding Arguments by Identifying Implicit Conclusions
Understanding Arguments by Identifying Implicit Premises
Adding Both Conclusion and Premises
Guidelines and Warnings about Adding Implicit Premises and Conclusions
Moving to Real World Discourse
Simplifying and Paraphrasing
Finding an Argument in a Sea of Words
Reconstructing Arguments with Subordinate Conclusions
Evaluating Arguments: Some Basic Questions
When Does the Conclusion Follow from the Premises?
The Counterexample Method of Showing that an Argument's Conclusion Does Not Follow
When Should the Premises Be Accepted as True?
Sample Appraisals: Examples of Techniques of Criticism
Some Special Cases: Arguments That We Should or Should Not Do Something
The Rationale for Using These Critical Techniques
When Does the Conclusion Follow?
A More Formal Approach to Validity (Optional)
Statements Containing Logical Connectives: When are They True
When are They False?
Truth Tables as a Test for Validity
Testing Validity of Arguments Containing Quantifiers
A More Formal Way of Representing Statements with Quantifiers
A Glimpses at Natural Deduction
Fallacies: Bad Arguments that Tend to Persuade
Persuasiveness: Legitimate and Illegitimate
Types of Persuasive Fallacies
Distraction Fallacies: False Dilemma, Slippery Slope, Straw Man
Resemblance Fallacies: Affirming the Consequent Denying the Antecedent, Equivocation, and Begging the Question
Review
Emotion and Reason in Argument
When Is an Emotional Appeal Illegitimate?
Emotion Fallacies: Appeal to Force and Appeal to Pity, Prejudicial Language
Emotion and Resemblance Combined: Appeal to Authority and Attacking the Person
Note on Terminology
Review
"That Depends On What You Mean BY..."
Unclear Expressions in the Premises: Looking for Shifts in Meaning
The Possibility of Misleading Definition
Kinds of Unclarity: Vagueness and Ambiguity
Interpreting and Evaluating: A Dialogue Process
Argument and Definition
Evaluating Definition-like Premises
Reconstructing Conceptual Theories
A Model for Conceptual Theories
Reconstructing Fragmentary Theories
The Criticism of Conceptual Theories
Conceptual Clarification and Argument
Review
Arguments That Are Not Deductive
Induction And Statistical Reasoning
Two Types of Inductive Arguments
Deductive versus Nondeductive Arguments
Criticizing Arguments that Generalize: Sampling Arguments
Attacking the Premises (Disputing the Data)
Questioning the Representativeness of the Sample
Pointing to a Shift in the Unit of Analysis
Challenging the Truth of the Conclusion
Summary of Criticisms
Arguments with Statistical Premises
Criticism of Arguments with Statistical Premises
Identifying Inductive and Deductive Arguments in Natural Prose Passages
Review: Types of Inductive Arguments
Causal, Analogical, And Convergent Arguments: Three More Kinds Of Nondeductive Reasoning
Causal Generalization
Five Ways in which Causal Reasoning Might Fail
Supporting Causal Arguments
Problems with Generalizing Causal Claims
Arguments from Analogy
Convergent Arguments
Evaluation of Convergent versus Deductive Arguments
Representing Convergent Arguments and Counter-considerations
Applying Criticism to Convergent Arguments with Counter-Considerations: A Four-Step Process
Explanation and the Criticism of Theories
"That's Just a Theory." Picking Out Theories
Criticism of Theories
First-Stage Criticisms--Plausible Alternative
Doubtful Predictions
Review of Techniques for Criticizing Theories
Putting it all Together: Six Steps to Understanding and Evaluating Arguments
A Sample Application of the Six-Step Procedure
A Second Sample Application of the Six-Step Procedure
Making Reasonable Decisions as An Amateur In A World Of Specialists
Leaving It to the Experts
The Dilemma
Coping with the Dilemma
Creating Arguments and Theories in a World of Experts
The Strategy and Its Prospects
Can Information Technology Dissolve the Dilemma?
The Contemporary Problem of Knowledge
Glossary
Answers to Selected Exercises
Index

×
Free shipping on orders over $35*

*A minimum purchase of $35 is required. Shipping is provided via FedEx SmartPost® and FedEx Express Saver®. Average delivery time is 1 – 5 business days, but is not guaranteed in that timeframe. Also allow 1 - 2 days for processing. Free shipping is eligible only in the continental United States and excludes Hawaii, Alaska and Puerto Rico. FedEx service marks used by permission."Marketplace" orders are not eligible for free or discounted shipping.

Learn more about the TextbookRush Marketplace.

×