| |
| |
Preface | |
| |
| |
| |
Deciding What to Believe | |
| |
| |
Critical Reasoning Versus Passive Reading or Listening | |
| |
| |
Critical Reasoning Versus Mere Disagreement | |
| |
| |
Critical Reasoning as a Cooperative Enterprise | |
| |
| |
Some Common Misconceptions About Critical Reasoning | |
| |
| |
Benefits of Critical Reasoning | |
| |
| |
The Main Techniques of Critical Reasoning | |
| |
| |
| |
The Anatomy of Arguments: Identifying Premises and Conclusions | |
| |
| |
The Key to Identification: Seeing What Is Supported by What | |
| |
| |
Clues to Identifying Argument Part s: Indicator Words | |
| |
| |
Marking the Part s of Arguments | |
| |
| |
What to Do When There Are No Indicator Words | |
| |
| |
The Principle of Charitable Interpretation | |
| |
| |
Patterns of Argument | |
| |
| |
Identifying Premises and Conclusions in Longer Passages | |
| |
| |
| |
Understanding Arguments Through Reconstruction | |
| |
| |
Understanding Arguments by Identifying Implicit Conclusions | |
| |
| |
Understanding Arguments by Identifying Implicit Premises | |
| |
| |
Adding Both Conclusion and Premises | |
| |
| |
Guidelines and Warnings about Adding Implicit Premises and Conclusions | |
| |
| |
Moving to Real World Discourse | |
| |
| |
Simplifying and Paraphrasing | |
| |
| |
Finding an Argument in a Sea of Words | |
| |
| |
Reconstructing Arguments with Subordinate Conclusions | |
| |
| |
| |
Evaluating Arguments: Some Basic Questions | |
| |
| |
When Does the Conclusion Follow from the Premises? | |
| |
| |
The Counterexample Method of Showing that an Argument's Conclusion Does Not Follow | |
| |
| |
When Should the Premises Be Accepted as True? | |
| |
| |
Sample Appraisals: Examples of Techniques of Criticism | |
| |
| |
Some Special Cases: Arguments That We Should or Should Not Do Something | |
| |
| |
The Rationale for Using These Critical Techniques | |
| |
| |
| |
When Does the Conclusion Follow? | |
| |
| |
A More Formal Approach to Validity (Optional) | |
| |
| |
Statements Containing Logical Connectives: When are They True | |
| |
| |
When are They False? | |
| |
| |
Truth Tables as a Test for Validity | |
| |
| |
Testing Validity of Arguments Containing Quantifiers | |
| |
| |
A More Formal Way of Representing Statements with Quantifiers | |
| |
| |
A Glimpses at Natural Deduction | |
| |
| |
| |
Fallacies: Bad Arguments that Tend to Persuade | |
| |
| |
Persuasiveness: Legitimate and Illegitimate | |
| |
| |
Types of Persuasive Fallacies | |
| |
| |
Distraction Fallacies: False Dilemma, Slippery Slope, Straw Man | |
| |
| |
Resemblance Fallacies: Affirming the Consequent Denying the Antecedent, Equivocation, and Begging the Question | |
| |
| |
Review | |
| |
| |
Emotion and Reason in Argument | |
| |
| |
When Is an Emotional Appeal Illegitimate? | |
| |
| |
Emotion Fallacies: Appeal to Force and Appeal to Pity, Prejudicial Language | |
| |
| |
Emotion and Resemblance Combined: Appeal to Authority and Attacking the Person | |
| |
| |
Note on Terminology | |
| |
| |
Review | |
| |
| |
| |
"That Depends On What You Mean BY..." | |
| |
| |
Unclear Expressions in the Premises: Looking for Shifts in Meaning | |
| |
| |
The Possibility of Misleading Definition | |
| |
| |
Kinds of Unclarity: Vagueness and Ambiguity | |
| |
| |
Interpreting and Evaluating: A Dialogue Process | |
| |
| |
Argument and Definition | |
| |
| |
Evaluating Definition-like Premises | |
| |
| |
Reconstructing Conceptual Theories | |
| |
| |
A Model for Conceptual Theories | |
| |
| |
Reconstructing Fragmentary Theories | |
| |
| |
The Criticism of Conceptual Theories | |
| |
| |
Conceptual Clarification and Argument | |
| |
| |
Review | |
| |
| |
| |
Arguments That Are Not Deductive | |
| |
| |
Induction And Statistical Reasoning | |
| |
| |
Two Types of Inductive Arguments | |
| |
| |
Deductive versus Nondeductive Arguments | |
| |
| |
Criticizing Arguments that Generalize: Sampling Arguments | |
| |
| |
Attacking the Premises (Disputing the Data) | |
| |
| |
Questioning the Representativeness of the Sample | |
| |
| |
Pointing to a Shift in the Unit of Analysis | |
| |
| |
Challenging the Truth of the Conclusion | |
| |
| |
Summary of Criticisms | |
| |
| |
Arguments with Statistical Premises | |
| |
| |
Criticism of Arguments with Statistical Premises | |
| |
| |
Identifying Inductive and Deductive Arguments in Natural Prose Passages | |
| |
| |
Review: Types of Inductive Arguments | |
| |
| |
| |
Causal, Analogical, And Convergent Arguments: Three More Kinds Of Nondeductive Reasoning | |
| |
| |
Causal Generalization | |
| |
| |
Five Ways in which Causal Reasoning Might Fail | |
| |
| |
Supporting Causal Arguments | |
| |
| |
Problems with Generalizing Causal Claims | |
| |
| |
Arguments from Analogy | |
| |
| |
Convergent Arguments | |
| |
| |
Evaluation of Convergent versus Deductive Arguments | |
| |
| |
Representing Convergent Arguments and Counter-considerations | |
| |
| |
Applying Criticism to Convergent Arguments with Counter-Considerations: A Four-Step Process | |
| |
| |
| |
Explanation and the Criticism of Theories | |
| |
| |
"That's Just a Theory." Picking Out Theories | |
| |
| |
Criticism of Theories | |
| |
| |
First-Stage Criticisms--Plausible Alternative | |
| |
| |
Doubtful Predictions | |
| |
| |
Review of Techniques for Criticizing Theories | |
| |
| |
| |
Putting it all Together: Six Steps to Understanding and Evaluating Arguments | |
| |
| |
A Sample Application of the Six-Step Procedure | |
| |
| |
A Second Sample Application of the Six-Step Procedure | |
| |
| |
| |
Making Reasonable Decisions as An Amateur In A World Of Specialists | |
| |
| |
Leaving It to the Experts | |
| |
| |
The Dilemma | |
| |
| |
Coping with the Dilemma | |
| |
| |
Creating Arguments and Theories in a World of Experts | |
| |
| |
The Strategy and Its Prospects | |
| |
| |
Can Information Technology Dissolve the Dilemma? | |
| |
| |
The Contemporary Problem of Knowledge | |
| |
| |
Glossary | |
| |
| |
Answers to Selected Exercises | |
| |
| |
Index | |