| |
| |
Editor's Introduction | |
| |
| |
Preface | |
| |
| |
Introduction | |
| |
| |
| |
Of the division of Philosophy | |
| |
| |
| |
Of the realm of Philosophy in general | |
| |
| |
| |
Of the Critique of Judgment as a means of combining the two parts of Philosophy into a whole | |
| |
| |
| |
Of Judgment as a faculty legislating a priori | |
| |
| |
| |
The principle of the formal purposiveness of nature is a transcendental principle of Judgment | |
| |
| |
| |
Of the combination of the feeling of pleasure with the concept of the purposiveness of nature | |
| |
| |
| |
Of the aesthetical representation of the purposiveness of nature | |
| |
| |
| |
Of the logical representation of the purposiveness of nature | |
| |
| |
| |
Of the connexion of the legislation of Understanding with that of Reason by means of the Judgment | |
| |
| |
| |
Critique of the Aesthetical Judgment | |
| |
| |
| |
Analytic of the Aesthetical Judgment | |
| |
| |
| |
Analytic of the Beautiful | |
| |
| |
First Moment of the judgment of taste, according to quality | |
| |
| |
| |
The judgment of taste is aesthetical | |
| |
| |
| |
The satisfaction which determines the judgment of taste is disinterested | |
| |
| |
| |
The satisfaction in the pleasant is bound up with interest | |
| |
| |
| |
The satisfaction in the good is bound up with interest | |
| |
| |
| |
Comparison of the three specifically different kinds of satisfaction | |
| |
| |
Second Moment of the judgment of taste, viz. according to quantity | |
| |
| |
| |
The Beautiful is that which apart from concepts is represented as the object of a universal satisfaction | |
| |
| |
| |
Comparison of the Beautiful with the Pleasant and the Good by means of the above characteristic | |
| |
| |
| |
The universality of the satisfaction is represented in a judgment of Taste only as subjective | |
| |
| |
| |
Investigation of the question whether in the judgment of taste the feeling of pleasure precedes or follows the judging of the object | |
| |
| |
Third Moment of judgments of taste, according to the relation of the purposes which are brought into consideration therein | |
| |
| |
| |
Of purposiveness in general | |
| |
| |
| |
The judgment of taste has nothing at its basis but the form of the purposiveness of an object (or of its mode of representation) | |
| |
| |
| |
The judgment of taste rests on a priori grounds | |
| |
| |
| |
The pure judgment of taste is independent of charm and emotion | |
| |
| |
| |
Elucidation by means of examples | |
| |
| |
| |
The judgment of taste is quite independent of the concept of perfection | |
| |
| |
| |
The judgment of taste, by which an object is declared to be beautiful under the condition of a definite concept, is not pure | |
| |
| |
| |
Of the Ideal of Beauty | |
| |
| |
Fourth Moment of the judgment of taste, according to the modality of the satisfaction in the object | |
| |
| |
| |
What the modality in a judgment of taste is | |
| |
| |
| |
The subjective necessity, which we ascribe to the judgment of taste, is conditioned | |
| |
| |
| |
The condition of necessity which a judgment of taste asserts is the Idea of a common sense | |
| |
| |
| |
Have we ground for presupposing a common sense? | |
| |
| |
| |
The necessity of the universal agreement that is thought in a judgment of taste is a subjective necessity, which is represented as objective under the presupposition of a common sense | |
| |
| |
General remark on the first section of the Analytic | |
| |
| |
| |
Analytic of the Sublime | |
| |
| |
| |
Transition from the faculty which judges of the Beautiful to that which judges of the Sublime | |
| |
| |
| |
Of the divisions of an investigation into the feeling of the sublime | |
| |
| |
| |
Of the Mathematically Sublime | |
| |
| |
| |
Explanation of the term "sublime" | |
| |
| |
| |
Of that estimation of the magnitude of natural things which is requisite for the Idea of the Sublime | |
| |
| |
| |
Of the quality of the satisfaction in our judgments upon the Sublime | |
| |
| |
| |
Of the Dynamically Sublime in Nature | |
| |
| |
| |
Of Nature regarded as Might | |
| |
| |
| |
Of the modality of the judgment upon the sublime in nature | |
| |
| |
General remark upon the exposition of the aesthetical reflective Judgment | |
| |
| |
Deduction of [pure] aesthetical judgments | |
| |
| |
| |
The Deduction of aesthetical judgments on the objects of nature must not be directed to what we call Sublime in nature, but only to the Beautiful | |
| |
| |
| |
Of the method of deduction of judgments of Taste | |
| |
| |
| |
First peculiarity of the judgment of Taste | |
| |
| |
| |
Second peculiarity of the judgment of Taste | |
| |
| |
| |
There is no objective principle of Taste possible | |
| |
| |
| |
The principle of Taste is the subjective principle of Judgment in general | |
| |
| |
| |
Of the problem of a Deduction of judgments of Taste | |
| |
| |
| |
What is properly asserted a priori of an object in a judgment of Taste | |
| |
| |
| |
Deduction of judgments of Taste | |
| |
| |
| |
Of the communicability of a sensation | |
| |
| |
| |
Of Taste as a kind of sensus communis | |
| |
| |
| |
Of the empirical interest in the Beautiful | |
| |
| |
| |
Of the intellectual interest in the Beautiful | |
| |
| |
| |
Of Art in general | |
| |
| |
| |
Of beautiful Art | |
| |
| |
| |
Beautiful Art is an art, in so far as it seems like nature | |
| |
| |
| |
Beautiful Art is the art of genius | |
| |
| |
| |
Elucidation and confirmation of the above explanation of Genius | |
| |
| |
| |
Of the relation of Genius to Taste | |
| |
| |
| |
Of the faculties of the mind that constitute Genius | |
| |
| |
| |
Of the combination of Taste with Genius in the products of beautiful Art | |
| |
| |
| |
Of the division of the beautiful arts | |
| |
| |
| |
Of the combination of beautiful arts in one and the same product | |
| |
| |
| |
Comparison of the respective aesthetical worth of the beautiful arts | |
| |
| |
| |
Remark | |
| |
| |
| |
Dialectic of the Aesthetical Judgment | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Representation of the antinomy of Taste | |
| |
| |
| |
Solution of the antinomy of Taste | |
| |
| |
| |
Of the Idealism of the purposiveness of both Nature and Art as the unique principle of the aesthetical Judgment | |
| |
| |
| |
Of Beauty as the symbol of Morality | |
| |
| |
| |
Appendix: Of the method of Taste | |
| |
| |
| |
Critique of the Teleological Judgment | |
| |
| |
| |
Of the objective purposiveness of Nature | |
| |
| |
| |
Analytic of the Teleological Judgment | |
| |
| |
| |
Of the objective purposiveness which is merely formal as distinguished from that which is material | |
| |
| |
| |
Of the relative, as distinguished from the inner, purposiveness of nature | |
| |
| |
| |
Of the peculiar character of things as natural purposes | |
| |
| |
| |
Things regarded as natural purposes are organised beings | |
| |
| |
| |
Of the principle of judging of internal purposiveness in organised beings | |
| |
| |
| |
Of the principle of the teleological judging of nature in general as a system of purposes | |
| |
| |
| |
Of the principle of Teleology as internal principle of natural science | |
| |
| |
| |
Dialectic of the Teleological Judgment | |
| |
| |
| |
What is an antinomy of the Judgment? | |
| |
| |
| |
Representation of this antinomy | |
| |
| |
| |
Preliminary to the solution of the above antinomy | |
| |
| |
| |
Of the different systems which deal with the purposiveness of nature | |
| |
| |
| |
None of the above systems give what they pretend | |
| |
| |
| |
The reason that we cannot treat the concept of a Technic of nature dogmatically is the fact that a natural purpose is inexplicable | |
| |
| |
| |
The concept of an objective purposiveness of nature is a critical principle of Reason for the reflective Judgment | |
| |
| |
| |
Remark | |
| |
| |
| |
Of the peculiarity of the human Understanding, by means of which the concept of a natural purpose is possible | |
| |
| |
| |
Of the union of the principle of the universal mechanism of matter with the teleological principle in the Technic of nature | |
| |
| |
| |
Methodology of the Teleological Judgment | |
| |
| |
| |
Whether teleology must be treated as if it belonged to the doctrine of nature | |
| |
| |
| |
Of the necessary subordination of the mechanical to the teleological principle in the explanation of a thing as a natural purpose | |
| |
| |
| |
Of the association of mechanism with the teleological principle in the explanation of a natural purpose as a natural product | |
| |
| |
| |
Of the teleological system in the external relations of organised beings | |
| |
| |
| |
Of the ultimate purpose of nature as a teleological system | |
| |
| |
| |
Of the final purpose of the existence of a world, i.e. of creation itself | |
| |
| |
| |
Of Physico-theology | |
| |
| |
| |
Of Ethico-theology | |
| |
| |
| |
Of the moral proof of the Being of God | |
| |
| |
| |
Limitation of the validity of the moral proof | |
| |
| |
| |
Of the use of the moral argument | |
| |
| |
| |
Of the kind of belief in a teleological proof of the Being of God | |
| |
| |
| |
Of the kind of belief produced by a practical faith | |
| |
| |
General remarks on Teleology | |