| |
| |
| About the Author | |
| |
| |
| Preface | |
| |
| |
| Acknowledgments | |
| |
| |
| |
| Public/Private Development Partnerships and Other Methods to Realize Projects | |
| |
| |
| Definition | |
| |
| |
| Responsibility and Risk | |
| |
| |
| Types of Public Entities | |
| |
| |
| Applications of the Approach | |
| |
| |
| The Wide Variety of Building Types | |
| |
| |
| Public Partners | |
| |
| |
| The Three Basic Types of Public/Private Partnerships | |
| |
| |
| The Three Basic Project Delivery Concepts | |
| |
| |
| The Six Basic Ownership and Investment Scenarios | |
| |
| |
| |
| Emergence of Public/Private Development Partnerships | |
| |
| |
| Core Reasons Behind the Growth of Public/Private Partnerships | |
| |
| |
| Benefits of Private/Public Partnerships | |
| |
| |
| Brief Overview of the History of Public/Private Partnerships | |
| |
| |
| Confluence of Trends Leading to the Increasing Use of the Public/Private Partnership Approach | |
| |
| |
| |
| Advantages and Disadvantages of Public/Private Development Partnerships | |
| |
| |
| Advantages from the Perspective of the Public Partner | |
| |
| |
| Disadvantages from the Perspective of the Public Partner | |
| |
| |
| Advantages from the Perspective of the Private Partner | |
| |
| |
| Disadvantages from the Perspective of the Private Partner | |
| |
| |
| Summary | |
| |
| |
| |
| A Highly Integrated Process Is Required to Achieve Successful Public/Private Development Partnerships | |
| |
| |
| Public Officials Should Control the Predevelopment Process | |
| |
| |
| The Highly Integrated and Multidisciplinary Public/Private Finance and Development Process | |
| |
| |
| The Steps of the Public/Private Finance and Development Process | |
| |
| |
| Summary | |
| |
| |
| |
| The Role and Responsibilities of the Public Partners | |
| |
| |
| The Public Partner | |
| |
| |
| Summary | |
| |
| |
| |
| Partnerships Can Be Customized to Meet the Objectives of Both Partners | |
| |
| |
| Project Participation | |
| |
| |
| Ownership of the Project | |
| |
| |
| Ownership, Investment, Development, and Operational Risks | |
| |
| |
| Responsibilities | |
| |
| |
| Economic Return | |
| |
| |
| Level of Control | |
| |
| |
| Implementation Schedule | |
| |
| |
| Advantages | |
| |
| |
| |
| Structuring Public/Private Finance Plans | |
| |
| |
| The Stainback Five-Part Finance and Development Approach | |
| |
| |
| Summary | |
| |
| |
| |
| The Developer Solicitation Process | |
| |
| |
| The Six Alternative Approaches to Solicit Interest from the Private Sector | |
| |
| |
| |
| The Three-Step RFI/RFQ/RFP Process | |
| |
| |
| |
| The Two-Step RFQ/RFP Process | |
| |
| |
| The RFQ Process Step by Step | |
| |
| |
| The Schedule to Complete the RFQ Stage | |
| |
| |
| The RFP Process | |
| |
| |
| A Step-by-Step Description of the RFP Process Using the Two-Step RFQ/RFP Process | |
| |
| |
| |
| The Single-Step RFP Process | |
| |
| |
| |
| The Prequalified Developer RFP Process | |
| |
| |
| |
| The Sole-Source Developer Technique | |
| |
| |
| |
| The RFQ/Negotiation Method | |
| |
| |
| |
| The Precarious Future of Public/Private Development Partnerships | |
| |
| |
| The Future Could Be Very Bright, but There Are Potential Problems | |
| |
| |
| Current Problems That Are Hindering the Increasing Use of the Public/Private Partnership Approach | |
| |
| |
| |
| Eight Case Studies | |
| |
| |
| |
| The Oregon Arena (The Rose Garden), Portland, Oregon | |
| |
| |
| |
| Oyster School/Henry Adams House, Washington, DC | |
| |
| |
| |
| University of Pennsylvania's Sansom Commons Development, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania | |
| |
| |
| |
| The VA Medical Center Complex, City of Medicine Center, Durham, North Carolina | |
| |
| |
| |
| Rutgers State University, New Brunswick, New Jersey | |
| |
| |
| |
| JFK International Airport, Terminal 4--International Air Building, Jamaica, New York | |
| |
| |
| |
| U.S. Soldiers' and Airmen's Home, Washington, DC | |
| |
| |
| |
| White Flint Metro Station, North Bethesda, Maryland | |
| |
| |
| |
| Developer Request for Qualifications | |
| |
| |
| |
| Phase II Developer Request for Proposals | |
| |
| |
| |
| Request for Qualifications for the Master Developer for the Finance, Design, and Development of the University X and the University Community | |
| |
| |
| |
| Request for Proposals--The James F. Oyster School Public/Private Development Partnerships | |
| |
| |
| Glossary | |
| |
| |
| Index | |