| |
| |
List of Figures | |
| |
| |
List of Tables | |
| |
| |
Acknowledgements | |
| |
| |
Preface | |
| |
| |
| |
Introduction | |
| |
| |
| |
How a meta-analysis works | |
| |
| |
Introduction | |
| |
| |
Individual studies | |
| |
| |
The summary effect | |
| |
| |
Heterogeneity of effect sizes | |
| |
| |
Summary points | |
| |
| |
| |
Why Perform a Meta-Analysis | |
| |
| |
Introduction | |
| |
| |
The SKIV meta-analysis | |
| |
| |
Statistical significance | |
| |
| |
Clinical importance of the effect | |
| |
| |
Consistency of effects | |
| |
| |
Summary points | |
| |
| |
| |
Effect Size and Precision | |
| |
| |
| |
Overview | |
| |
| |
Treatment effects and effect sizes | |
| |
| |
Parameters and estimates | |
| |
| |
Outline | |
| |
| |
| |
Effect Sizes Based on Means | |
| |
| |
Introduction | |
| |
| |
Raw (unstandardized) mean difference D | |
| |
| |
Standardized mean difference, D and G | |
| |
| |
Response ratiosSummary points | |
| |
| |
| |
Effect Sizes Based on Binary Data (2+2 Tables) | |
| |
| |
Introduction | |
| |
| |
Risk ratio | |
| |
| |
Odds ratio | |
| |
| |
Risk difference | |
| |
| |
Choosing an effect size index | |
| |
| |
Summary points | |
| |
| |
| |
Effect Sizes Based on Correlations | |
| |
| |
Introduction | |
| |
| |
Computing R | |
| |
| |
Other approaches | |
| |
| |
Summary points | |
| |
| |
| |
Converting Among Effect Sizes | |
| |
| |
Introduction | |
| |
| |
Converting from the log odds ratio to D | |
| |
| |
Converting from D to the log odds ratio | |
| |
| |
Converting from R to D | |
| |
| |
Converting from D to R | |
| |
| |
Summary points | |
| |
| |
| |
Factors that Affect Precision | |
| |
| |
Introduction | |
| |
| |
Factors that affect precision | |
| |
| |
Sample size | |
| |
| |
Study design | |
| |
| |
Summary points | |
| |
| |
| |
Concluding Remarks | |
| |
| |
Further reading | |
| |
| |
| |
Fixed-Effect Versus Random-Effects Models | |
| |
| |
| |
Overview | |
| |
| |
Introduction | |
| |
| |
Nomenclature | |
| |
| |
| |
Fixed-Effect Model | |
| |
| |
Introduction | |
| |
| |
The true effect size | |
| |
| |
Impact of sampling error | |
| |
| |
Performing a fixed-effect meta-analysis | |
| |
| |
Summary points | |
| |
| |
| |
Random-effects model | |
| |
| |
Introduction | |
| |
| |
The true effect sizes | |
| |
| |
Impact of sampling error | |
| |
| |
Performing a random-effects meta-analysis | |
| |
| |
Summary points | |
| |
| |
| |
Fixed Effect Versus Random-Effects Models | |
| |
| |
Introduction | |
| |
| |
Definition of a summary effect | |
| |
| |
Estimating the summary effect | |
| |
| |
Extreme effect size in large study | |
| |
| |
Confidence interval | |
| |
| |
The null hypothesis | |
| |
| |
Which model should we use? | |
| |
| |
Model should not be based on the test for heterogeneity | |
| |
| |
Concluding remarks | |
| |
| |
Summary points | |
| |
| |
| |
Worked Examples (Part 1) | |
| |
| |
Introduction | |
| |
| |
Worked example for continuous data (Part 1) | |
| |
| |
Worked example for binary data (Part 1) | |
| |
| |
Worked example for correlational data (Part 1) | |
| |
| |
Summary points | |
| |
| |
| |
Heterogeneity | |
| |
| |
| |
Overview | |
| |
| |
Introduction | |
| |
| |
| |
Identifying and Quantifying Heterogeneity | |
| |
| |
Introduction | |
| |
| |
Isolating the variation in true effects | |
| |
| |
Computing Q | |
| |
| |
Estimating tau-squared | |
| |
| |
The I 2 statistic | |
| |
| |
Comparing the measures of heterogeneity | |
| |
| |
Confidence intervals for T 2 | |
| |
| |
Confidence intervals (or uncertainty intervals) for I 2 | |
| |
| |
Summary points | |
| |
| |
| |
Prediction Intervals | |
| |
| |
Introduction | |
| |
| |
Prediction intervals in primary studies | |
| |
| |
Prediction intervals in meta-analysis | |
| |
| |
Confidence intervals and prediction intervals | |
| |
| |
Comparing the confidence interval with the prediction interval | |
| |
| |
Summary points | |
| |
| |
| |
Worked Examples (Part 2) | |
| |
| |
Introduction | |
| |
| |
Worked example for continuous data (Part 2) | |
| |
| |
Worked example for binary data (Part 2) | |
| |
| |
Worked example for correlational data (Part 2) | |
| |
| |
Summary points | |
| |
| |
| |
Subgroup Analyse | |
| |
| |
Introduction | |
| |
| |
Fixed-effect model within subgroups | |
| |
| |
Computational models | |
| |
| |
Random effects with separate estimates of T 2 | |
| |
| |
Random effects with pooled estimate of T 2 | |
| |
| |
The proportion of variance explained | |
| |
| |
Mixed-effect model | |
| |
| |
Obtaining an overall effect in the presence of subgroups | |
| |
| |
Summary points | |
| |
| |
| |
Meta-Regress | |