| |
| |
Introduction | |
| |
| |
| |
The Territorial Approach to Choice of Law: Concepts and Limitations | |
| |
| |
| |
Lex Loci: The Traditional Approach to Choice of Law | |
| |
| |
| |
The Lex Loci Approach in Tort Cases: The Carroll Case | |
| |
| |
| |
The Lex Loci Approach in Contract Cases: Milliken v. Pratt | |
| |
| |
| |
The Lex Loci Approach in Property Cases | |
| |
| |
| |
Other Areas | |
| |
| |
| |
"Escape Devices" | |
| |
| |
| |
Characterization | |
| |
| |
| |
Substance and Procedure | |
| |
| |
| |
Renvoi | |
| |
| |
| |
Public Policy | |
| |
| |
| |
Pleading and Proving Foreign Law | |
| |
| |
| |
Modern Approaches to Choice of Law | |
| |
| |
| |
The Scholarly Critique of the Territorial Approach | |
| |
| |
| |
New York and the "Center of Gravity" Approach: Auten and Haag | |
| |
| |
| |
Interest Analysis: The Currie Approach | |
| |
| |
| |
Choice of Law as an Exercise in Interpretation and Construction | |
| |
| |
| |
Identification of False and True Conflicts: The Heart of Interest Analysis | |
| |
| |
| |
Criticisms of the Currie Approach | |
| |
| |
| |
Identifying False Conflicts in New York: Guest Statutes and Beyond | |
| |
| |
| |
Guest Statutes in the New York Courts: Babcock, Dym, and Tooker | |
| |
| |
| |
Contiguous-Border Torts and the "Neumeier Rules" | |
| |
| |
| |
Conduct Regulation and Loss Distribution: Beyond Guest Statutes | |
| |
| |
| |
Resolving True Conflicts | |
| |
| |
| |
Currie's Approach | |
| |
| |
| |
Comparative Impairment | |
| |
| |
| |
Other Solutions: "Principles of Preference" and "Shared Policies" | |
| |
| |
| |
Territoriality Redux? | |
| |
| |
| |
The Second Restatement: The "Most Significant Relationship" | |
| |
| |
| |
Torts | |
| |
| |
| |
Contracts | |
| |
| |
| |
The Better Law | |
| |
| |
| |
Does It Matter? | |
| |
| |
| |
A Few Areas of Modern Interest | |
| |
| |
| |
A View of the Landscape | |
| |
| |
| |
Statutory Solutions to Choice of Law | |
| |
| |
| |
The "Rule of Validation," Party Autonomy, and Enforcement of Contractual Choice-of-Law Provisions | |
| |
| |
| |
Conflict of Laws and the Uniform Commercial Code | |
| |
| |
| |
Insurance Conflicts | |
| |
| |
| |
Conflicts in Products Liability Litigation: Two Examples | |
| |
| |
| |
Complex Litigation | |
| |
| |
| |
Conflicts in Cyberspace | |
| |
| |
| |
Constitutional Limitations on Choice of Law | |
| |
| |
| |
Due Process | |
| |
| |
| |
The Dick Case | |
| |
| |
| |
Values Protected by the Due Process Clause: Fairness to Individuals, Reasonable Foreseeability, and Protection from "Unfair Surprise" | |
| |
| |
| |
Full Faith and Credit | |
| |
| |
| |
The 1930s Cases on Full Faith and Credit and Choice of Law | |
| |
| |
| |
The Continuing Relevance of Pacific Employers | |
| |
| |
| |
Due Process and Full Faith and Credit, Merged | |
| |
| |
| |
Implementing Dick and Pacific Employers: The Watson and Clay Cases | |
| |
| |
| |
The Modern Cases: Hague and Shutts | |
| |
| |
| |
Full Faith and Credit, National Unity, and Sovereign Immunity | |
| |
| |
| |
The Privileges & Immunities Clause and the Problem of Discrimination in Choice of Law | |
| |
| |
| |
Other Constitutional Provisions | |
| |
| |
| |
The Obligation to Provide a Forum | |
| |
| |
| |
Hughes v. Fetter (1951) | |
| |
| |
| |
Tennessee Coal, Iron & R.R. Co. v. George (1914) | |
| |
| |
| |
Recognition of Judgments | |
| |
| |
| |
The Basics of Claim and Issue Preclusion: A Review | |
| |
| |
| |
The Terminology of Preclusion | |
| |
| |
| |
Claim Preclusion | |
| |
| |
| |
The Claim Preclusion Principle Defined | |
| |
| |
| |
The "Same Claim" | |
| |
| |
| |
The "Same Parties" | |
| |
| |
| |
A "Judgment on the Merits" | |
| |
| |
| |
Some Additional Issues | |
| |
| |
| |
Issue Preclusion | |
| |
| |
| |
The Same Issue: What Is an "Issue"? | |
| |
| |
| |
Actually Litigated and Determined | |
| |
| |
| |
Essential to the Judgment | |
| |
| |
| |
Nonmutuality in Issue Preclusion | |
| |
| |
| |
Nonmutuality, Complex and Public Law Litigation, and Class Actions | |
| |
| |
| |
The Limits of Preclusion | |
| |
| |
| |
The Difference Between Preclusion and Precedent | |
| |
| |
| |
Interjurisdictional Preclusion and Full Faith and Credit | |
| |
| |
| |
Full Faith and Credit: Article IV and 28 U.S.C. � 1738 | |
| |
| |
| |
The Basic Doctrine: Fauntleroy v. Lum | |
| |
| |
| |
Interjurisdictional Recognition and the Role of State Interests | |
| |
| |
| |
Workers' Compensation: An Exception to Full Faith and Credit? | |
| |
| |
| |
Full Faith and Credit to Judgments Rendered Without Jurisdiction | |
| |
| |
| |
Full Faith and Credit, Real Property, and Jurisdiction | |
| |
| |
| |
Full Faith and Credit to Equitable Decrees | |
| |
| |
| |
Congress's Power to Legislate Pursuant to the Full Faith and Credit Clause and the Problem of "Partial Repeal" of � 1738 | |
| |
| |
| |
Conflict of Laws and Domestic Relations | |
| |
| |
| |
Marriage | |
| |
| |
| |
Divorce | |
| |
| |
| |
Ex Parte Divorce and Full Faith and Credit: The Williams Decisions | |
| |
| |
| |
Divorce by Consent | |
| |
| |
| |
Foreign Divorces Not Subject to Full Faith and Credit | |
| |
| |
| |
Dissolution of Same-Sex Marriages and Civil Unions | |
| |
| |
| |
The Incidents of Marriage and "Divisible Divorce" | |
| |
| |
| |
Interstate Recognition of Child Custody Decrees | |
| |
| |
| |
Full Faith and Credit and Domestic Child Custody Decrees | |
| |
| |
| |
International Child Abduction: The Hague Convention | |
| |
| |
| |
Spousal and Child Support Orders | |
| |
| |
| |
The Law Applied in Federal Courts | |
| |
| |
| |
The "Erie Doctrine": An Introduction | |
| |
| |
| |
Why Discuss Erie in a Book on Conflict of Laws? | |
| |
| |
| |
The Three Broad Dimensions of the "Erie Doctrine" | |
| |
| |
| |
"Substance" vs. "Procedure" | |
| |
| |
| |
The Role of the Constitution in the "Erie Doctrine" | |
| |
| |
| |
Federal Courts Sitting in Diversity: Surrogates for State Courts or an Independent Judicial System? | |
| |
| |
| |
The Supreme Court's Messy Line of Decisions, and Not the Logically Consistent Theories of Legal Scholars, Are the Law | |
| |
| |
| |
The Vast Majority of "Erie Decisions" Have Been Rendered by the Lower Federal Courts, Not the Supreme Court | |
| |
| |
| |
The Decision in Erie R.R. v. Tompkins (1938) | |
| |
| |
| |
What Erie Got Rid Of | |
| |
| |
| |
Justice Story and Swift v. Tyson (1842) | |
| |
| |
| |
What Was Wrong (Or Became Wrong) About Swift v. Tyson? | |
| |
| |
| |
The Constitutional Basis of the Erie Decision | |
| |
| |
| |
Taking Stock of Erie | |
| |
| |
| |
The "Erie Doctrine" After Erie: From Klaxon (1941) to Walker (1980) | |
| |
| |
| |
Klaxon v. Stentor (1941) | |
| |
| |
| |
Limitations Periods: Guaranty Trust v. York (1945) | |
| |
| |
| |
More Than Forum Shopping: Byrd v. Blue Ridge (1958) | |
| |
| |
| |
The Role of the Rules Enabling Act: Hanna v. Plumer (1965) | |
| |
| |
| |
Is There an "Unavoidable Conflict"? Walker v. Armco Steel (1980) | |
| |
| |
| |
The "Erie Doctrine" After Walker v. Armco Steel | |
| |
| |
| |
Burlington Northern Ry. v. Woods (1987) | |
| |
| |
| |
Stewart Organization, Inc. v. Ricoh Corp. (1988) | |
| |
| |
| |
Gasperini: A Return to the Byrd Problem? | |
| |
| |
| |
The Latest: Semtek (2001) | |
| |
| |
| |
Federal Common Law After Erie | |
| |
| |
| |
Conflict of Laws in the International Sphere | |
| |
| |
| |
Some Introductory Comments | |
| |
| |
| |
Jurisdiction to Prescribe Under International Law | |
| |
| |
| |
The Presumption Against Extraterritoriality | |
| |
| |
| |
The Aramco Case: Title VII | |
| |
| |
| |
Extraterritorial Application of the U.S. Antitrust Laws | |
| |
| |
| |
The Presumption Against Territoriality as Applied to Other U.S. Laws | |
| |
| |
| |
Why Aren't Aramco and the Other "Extraterritoriality" Cases Treated as Choice-of-Law Cases? | |
| |
| |
| |
The Act-of-State Doctrine | |
| |
| |
| |
The Constitution and the Flag: Extraterritorial Reach of the U.S. Constitution | |
| |
| |
| |
The Status of International Law in American Courts | |
| |
| |
| |
Comparative Choice of Law: Conflicts Law Outside the United States | |
| |
| |
| |
Recognition of Foreign Judgments | |
| |
| |
| |
A Leading Case of Doubtful Modern Authority: Hilton v. Guyot (1895) | |
| |
| |
| |
Libel Tourism: A Case Study in the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign-Country Judgments | |
| |
| |
Table of Cases | |
| |
| |
Index | |