| |
| |
| Acknowledgments | |
| |
| |
| |
| A Good Time to Study the Language of Criminal Justice | |
| |
| |
| |
| Language and the Criminal Law | |
| |
| |
| The Language of Police and Suspects | |
| |
| |
| Linguistic Evidence Crimes of Language Some Goals and Limitations | |
| |
| |
| |
| Linguistics in the Law | |
| |
| |
| The Subsystems of Language | |
| |
| |
| Word Meaning: Two Ways of Thinking Discourse and Inferences from Context | |
| |
| |
| Linguistics in the Courts | |
| |
| |
| Linguistics and the Admissibility of Expert Evidence in American Courts | |
| |
| |
| |
| Gathering the Evidence | |
| |
| |
| |
| "Consensual" Searches | |
| |
| |
| The Bustamonte Case | |
| |
| |
| Requests versus Commands | |
| |
| |
| Consenting Racial Profiling | |
| |
| |
| Conclusion | |
| |
| |
| |
| Interrogation, Confession, and the Right to Counsel Invoking the Right to Counsel | |
| |
| |
| The Meaning of "Interrogation"Interrogation and the Problem of False Confessions | |
| |
| |
| Conclusion | |
| |
| |
| |
| Understanding Miranda | |
| |
| |
| The Rise of Miranda | |
| |
| |
| Reading Rights | |
| |
| |
| Suspects with Low Intelligence or Mental Problems Juveniles | |
| |
| |
| Suspects Whose Native Language Is Not English Deaf Defendants | |
| |
| |
| How Can Comprehension Be Improved? | |
| |
| |
| Conclusion | |
| |
| |
| |
| Linguistic Evidence in Court | |
| |
| |
| |
| Exact Words | |
| |
| |
| Forget about It: Human Memory for Verbatim Speech | |
| |
| |
| The Legal System's Response: Substance Is Good Enough | |
| |
| |
| Jailhouse Informants | |
| |
| |
| Language Crimes without the Language | |
| |
| |
| Conclusion | |
| |
| |
| |
| Who Said That? | |
| |
| |
| Legal Standards for Identifying Speakers | |
| |
| |
| Voice Recognition Research and the Reliability of Identifications | |
| |
| |
| Expert Speaker Identification | |
| |
| |
| Conclusion | |
| |
| |
| |
| Who Wrote That? | |
| |
| |
| Hauptmannand the Document Examiners | |
| |
| |
| Leaving It to the Jury | |
| |
| |
| The Return of the Experts? | |
| |
| |
| Some Promise for an Improved Science of Authorship Attribution | |
| |
| |
| Some Easier Cases | |
| |
| |
| Conclusion | |
| |
| |
| |
| Crimes of Language | |
| |
| |
| |
| Solicitation, Conspiracy, Bribery | |
| |
| |
| Solicitation | |
| |
| |
| Conspiracy Bribery | |
| |
| |
| |
| Threats | |
| |
| |
| What Constitutes a Threat? | |
| |
| |
| Indirect and Ambiguous Threats | |
| |
| |
| Political Hyperbole | |
| |
| |
| Conclusion | |
| |
| |
| |
| Perjury | |
| |
| |
| The Bronston Case | |
| |
| |
| Did Clinton Lie? | |
| |
| |
| Perjury and Lying Conclusion | |
| |
| |
| |
| Where Do We Go from Here? | |
| |
| |
| Law Enforcement | |
| |
| |
| Legislatures and the Executive Branch | |
| |
| |
| Courts Attorneys | |
| |
| |
| Linguists, Psychologists, and Other Scholars | |
| |
| |
| Notes | |
| |
| |
| Index | |