Clashing Views in Energy and Society

ISBN-10: 0078127556

ISBN-13: 9780078127557

Edition: 2009

Authors: Thomas A. Easton

List price: $54.67 Buy it from $1.15
30 day, 100% satisfaction guarantee

If an item you ordered from TextbookRush does not meet your expectations due to an error on our part, simply fill out a return request and then return it by mail within 30 days of ordering it for a full refund of item cost.

Learn more about our returns policy

Description:

TAKING SIDES: CLASHING VIEWS IN ENERGY AND SOCIETY presents current controversial issues in a debate-style format designed to stimulate student interest and develop critical thinking skills. Each issue is thoughtfully framed with an issue summary, an issue introduction, and a postscript. An instructor?s manual with testing material is available online for each volume. USING TAKING SIDES IN THE CLASSROOM is also an excellent instructor resource with practical suggestions on incorporating this effective approach in the classroom. Each TAKING SIDES reader features an annotated listing of selected World Wide Web sites and is supported by our student website, www.mhcls.com/online..
Used Starting from $26.00
what's this?
Rush Rewards U
Members Receive:
coins
coins
You have reached 400 XP and carrot coins. That is the daily max!
Study Briefs

Limited time offer: Get the first one free! (?)

All the information you need in one place! Each Study Brief is a summary of one specific subject; facts, figures, and explanations to help you learn faster.

Add to cart
Study Briefs
Periodic Table Online content $4.95 $1.99
Add to cart
Study Briefs
Periodic Table Online content $4.95 $1.99
Customers also bought
Loading
Loading
Loading
Loading
Loading
Loading
Loading
Loading
Loading
Loading

Book details

List price: $54.67
Copyright year: 2009
Publisher: McGraw-Hill Higher Education
Publication date: 12/5/2008
Binding: Paperback
Pages: 432
Size: 6.00" wide x 9.25" long x 0.75" tall
Weight: 1.276
Language: English

McGraw-Hill authors represent the leading experts in their fields and are dedicated to improving the lives, careers, and interests of readers worldwide

Preface
Introduction
Unit 1
Can the United States Continue to Rely on Oil as a Major Source of Energy?
Yes: from "U.S. Oil Supplies Are Not at Risk," USA Today Magazine (November 2007)
No: from "The Gospel According to Matthew," Texas Monthly (February 2008)
Is It Realistic for the united States to Move Toward Greater Energy Independence?
Yes: from Testimony on "The Geopolitical Implications of Rising Oil Dependence and Global Warming" before the House Select Committee on Energy Independence and Global Warming (April 18, 2007)
No: from "The Seven Myths of Energy Independence," Mother Jones (May/June 2008)
Should Cars Be More Efficient.
Yes: from "CAFE Standards," Testimony before Committee on Senate Commerce, Science and Transportation (March 6, 2007)
No: from "Why the Government's CAFE Standards for Fuel Efficiency Should be Repealed, Not Increased," Heritage Foundation Backgrounder #1458 (July 11, 2001)
Should the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge Be Opened to Oil Drilling?
Yes: from "To Drill or Not to Drill?" Independent Review (Fall 2001)
No: from ANWR Minority Views from Senate Energy Committee (October 24th, 2005)
Should Utilities Burn More Coal?
Yes: from "Clean Coal," Testimony before the Senate Finance Committee (April 26, 2007)
No: from "Coal Rush!" World Watch (January/February 2007)
Global Warming
Are Global Warming Facts Too Uncertain to Guide Government Policy?
Yes: from "How Serious Is the Global Warming Threat?" Society (September 2007)
No: from Testimony on "Questions Surrounding the �Hockey Stick' Temperature Studies: Implications for Climate Change Assessments," before the Committee on Energy and Commerce, Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations, U.S. House of Representatives (July 27, 2006)
Is Global Warming Skepticism Just Smoke and Mirrors?
Yes: Union of Concerned Scientists, from "Smoke, Mirrors & Hot Air: How ExxonMobil Uses Big Tobacco's Tactics to Manufacture Uncertainty on Climate Science," http://www.ucsusa.org/global_warming/science/exxonmobil-smoke-mirrors-hot.html (January 2007)
No: from "Liberal �Scientists' Lead Jihad Against Global-Warming Skeptics," Human Events, http://www.cei.org/gencon/019,05908.cfm or http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=20573 (may 8, 2007)
Are the Potential Costs of Global Warming Too High to Ignore?
Yes: from "Stern Review: The Economics of Climate Change, Executive Summary," http://www.hm-treasury.gov.uk/independent_reviews/stern_review_economics_climate_change/sternreview_index.cfm (october 30, 2006)
No: from "'Global Warming' Scare-Mongering Revisited," National Observer (Autumn 2007)
Can Carbon Trading Help Control Carbon Emissions?
Yes: from "Carbon Trading," Electric Perspectives (September/October 2005)
No: from "Trading Away the Earth: Pollution Credits and the Perils of �Free Market Environmentalism,'" Dollars & Sense (March/April 1996)
Is Carbon Capture Technology Ready to Limit Carbon Emissions?
Yes: from "Carbon Capture and Sequestration," Testimony before the Committee on House Energy and Commerce, Subcommittee on Energy and Air Quality (March 6, 2007)
No: from "Carbon Capture & Storage: Blue-Sky Technology or Just Blowing Smoke?" Environmental Health Perspectives (November 2007)
Is Geoemgineering" a Possible Answer to Global Warming?
Yes: from "Feasibility of Cooling the Earth with a Cloud of Small Spacecraft near the Inner Lagrange Point (L1)," Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America (November 14, 2006)
No: from "The Climate Engineers," Wilson Quarterly (Spring 2007)
Unit 3
Does Nuclear Power Need GovernmentHelp?
Yes: from "Nuclear Power," Testimony before the U.S. House Committee on Science and Technology Hearing on Opportunities and Challenges for Nuclear Power (April 23, 2008)
No: from Testimony before the U.S. House Committee on Science and Technology Hearing on Opportunities and Challenges for Nuclear Power (April 23, 2008)
Should the United States Continue to Focus Plans for Permanent Nuclear Waste Disposal Exclusively at Yucca Mountain?
Yes: from Recommendation by the Secretary of Energy Regarding the Suitability of the Yucca Mountain Site (February 2002)
No: from "A Gift to Terrorists?" Earth Island Journal (Winter 2002-2003)
Should the United States Reprocess Spent Nuclear Fuel?
Yes: from Statement before the House Committee on Science, energy Subcommittee, Hearing on Nuclear Fuel Reprocessing (June 16, 2005)
No: from "Rethinking Nuclear Fuel Recyclink," Scientific American (May 2008)
Alternative Energy Sources
Is Wind Power Green?
Yes: from "Whither Wind?" Orion (September-October 2006)
No: from "Wayward Wind," Speech Given in the Township of Perry, near Silver Lake, Wyoming County, New York (June 19, 2006)
Do Biofuels Enhance Energy Security?
Yes: from Testimony before Committee on Senate Energy and Natural Resources (April 12, 2007)
No: from "Ethanol: Train Wreck Ahead," Issues in Science and Technology (Fall 2007)
Can Hydropower Play a Role in Preventing Climate Change?
Yes: from "The Issue of Greenhouse Gases from Hydroelectric Reservoirs: From Boreal to Tropical Regions," United Nations Symposium on Hydropower and Sustainable Development, Beijing, china (October 27-29, 2004)
No: from "Hydropower: Not the Answer to Preventing Climate Change," (http://www.americanrivers.org) (2007)
Will Hydrogen Replace Fossil Fuels for Cars?
Yes: from "Fueling the Future: The Road to the Hydrogen Economy," Statement Presented to the Committee on Science, Subcommittee on Research and Subcommittee on Energy, U.S. House of Representatives (July 20, 2005)
No: from "Warning: The Hydrogen Economy May be More Distant Than It Appears," Popular Science (January 2005)
Is There Any Such Thing as "Free Energy"?
Yes: from "Introduction to Zero Point Energy," Infinite Energy, http://www.integrityresearchinstitute.org/ (July/August 2007)
No: from Voodoo Science (Oxford University Press, 2000)
Contributors
×
Free shipping on orders over $35*

*A minimum purchase of $35 is required. Shipping is provided via FedEx SmartPost® and FedEx Express Saver®. Average delivery time is 1 – 5 business days, but is not guaranteed in that timeframe. Also allow 1 - 2 days for processing. Free shipping is eligible only in the continental United States and excludes Hawaii, Alaska and Puerto Rico. FedEx service marks used by permission."Marketplace" orders are not eligible for free or discounted shipping.

Learn more about the TextbookRush Marketplace.

×