Skip to content

We Dissent Talking Back to the Rehnquist Court, Eight Cases That Subverted Civil Liberties and Civil Rights

Best in textbook rentals since 2012!

ISBN-10: 0814707238

ISBN-13: 9780814707234

Edition: 2009

Authors: Michael Avery

List price: $35.00
Blue ribbon 30 day, 100% satisfaction guarantee!
what's this?
Rush Rewards U
Members Receive:
Carrot Coin icon
XP icon
You have reached 400 XP and carrot coins. That is the daily max!

Description:

We Dissent boldly takes the Constitution back from the Rehnquist Court that has reneged on its promises, and eloquently shows us what the Constitution can be at its best -- a progressive guardian of liberty, equality, and justice for the most vulnerable. --David Cole, author of Enemy Aliens: Double Standards and Constitutional Freedoms in the War on Terrorism The lawyers and legal commentators who contribute to We Dissent unanimously agree that during Chief Justice William Rehnquists nineteen-year tenure, the Supreme Court failed to adequately protect civil liberties and civil rights. This is evident in majority opinions written for numerous cases heard by the Rehnquist Court, and eight of…    
Customers also bought

Book details

List price: $35.00
Copyright year: 2009
Publisher: New York University Press
Publication date: 1/1/2009
Binding: Hardcover
Pages: 245
Size: 5.98" wide x 9.02" long x 0.59" tall
Weight: 0.990
Language: English

Michael Avery is Professor at Suffolk University Law School in Boston and a past president of the National Lawyers Guild. He was a civil rights and criminal defense lawyer for nearly thirty years before joining the Suffolk faculty in 1998. He is co-author of Police Misconduct: Law and Litigation and Handbook of Massachusetts Evidence.

Introduction
Alden v. Maine: Sovereign Immunity-A Vestige of Monarchy Inconsistent with Democratic Values
Arkansas Educational Television Commission v. Forbes: Betraying Freedom of Political Expression and Undermining Democracy
Cuyahoga Falls v. Buckeye: The Supreme Court's "Intent Doctrine"-Undermining Viable Discrimination Claims and Remedies for People of Color
United States v. Whren: The Fourth Amendment Problem with Pretextual Traffic Stops
County Of Sacramento v. Lewis: Protecting Life and Liberty Under the Constitution-Reckless Indifference to Life Does Not Shock the Conscience of the Supreme Court
Chavez v. Martinez: The Court Fails to Hold That Interrogation by Means of Torture Is Unconstitutional
Saucier v. Katz: Qualified Immunity as a Doctrine of Dilution of Constitutional Rights
Strickland v. Washington: Gutting Gideon and Providing Cover for Incompetent Counsel
Note to the Reader Regarding Legal Citations
About the Contributors
Index